Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27298083›Full record

ArticleAppetite2016

Power of Food Scale in association with weight outcomes and dieting in a nationally representative cohort of U.S. young adults.

L M Lipsky, T R Nansel, D L Haynie, D Liu, M H Eisenberg, B Simons-Morton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L M LipskyHealth Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: lipskylm@mail.nih.gov.
T R NanselHealth Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States.
D L HaynieHealth Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States.
D LiuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States.
M H EisenbergHealth Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States.
B Simons-MortonHealth Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, North Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Study Of Health Behavior In School ChildrenZIAHD002525 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SIMONS-MORTON, BRUCE G · 2009 to 2019
$5.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200001CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200001I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food reward sensitivity may influence susceptibility to overeating in a permissive food environment, contributing to unintended weight gain and intentional weight loss behavior. This study examined associations of food reward sensitivity, assessed by the Power of Food Scale (PFS), with weight outcomes and dieting in a nationally representative cohort of U.S. emerging adults. Wave 5 (W5, 5th year of follow-up) respondents from the NEXT Generation Health Study were included (N = 2202, W5 age = 20.3 ± 0.02 years). Baseline and W5 BMI, W5 weight status (normal weight = 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25, overweight = 25 ≤ BMI < 30, obese = BMI ≥ 30), BMI change (W5-baseline BMI) and onset of overweight or obesity (OWOB) were calculated from self-reported height and weight. PFS (aggregate and 3 domain scores: food available, present, and tasted) and dieting for weight-loss were assessed at W5. Adjusted linear regressions estimated associations of PFS with W5 BMI and BMI change. Log-binomial regressions estimated associations of high W5 BMI (≥25), OWOB onset and dieting with PFS. Post hoc analyses estimated associations of PFS with W5 perceived weight status (overweight vs. about right or underweight). W5 BMI = 25.73 ± 0.32 kg/m(2), and OWOB onset occurred in 27.7% of participants. The PFS-food available score was associated with BMI change, β ± SE = 0.41 ± 0.19. Other PFS scores were not associated with weight outcomes. Dieting prevalence was higher in participants with high versus low W5 BMI (61% versus 32%), and was positively associated with all PFS scores except the PFS-food tasted score, e.g., relative risk (RR) of dieting for PFS-aggregate = 1.13, 95%CI [1.01-1.26]. Post-hoc analyses indicated perceived overweight was positively associated with PFS-food available, 1.12, [1.01-1.24], and PFS-food present, 1.13, [1.03-1.24]. PFS was positively related to dieting and perceived overweight, but not concurrent or change in weight status in a representative cohort of U.S. emerging adults.

Indexed as

RewardWeight GainWeight LossBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesDietFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFoodHumansLinear ModelsMaleObesityOverweightThinnessYoung AdultAdolescentBody mass indexCohort studiesObesityOverweightYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID27298083
PMCPMC4980265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.