Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27297679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

An ontology-driven, case-based clinical decision support model for removable partial denture design.

Qingxiao Chen, Ji Wu, Shusen Li, Peijun Lyu, Yong Wang, Miao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Preliminary Evaluation of Large Language Models in Kennedy Classification and Removable Partial Denture Planning: An In Silico Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Automated design prediction for definitive obturator prostheses: A case-based reasoning study.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry Practices.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [A technique to design the framework of removable partial denture by multi-stage expert system].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qingxiao ChenCenter of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun Avenue South, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, PR China.
Ji WuTsinghua-Rohm Electronic Engineering Hall 8-301,Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Shusen LiTsinghua-Rohm Electronic Engineering Hall 8-301,Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Peijun LyuCenter of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun Avenue South, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, PR China.
Yong WangCenter of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun Avenue South, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, PR China.
Miao LiTsinghua-Rohm Electronic Engineering Hall 8-301,Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the initial work toward developing a clinical decision support model for specific design of removable partial dentures (RPDs) in dentistry. We developed an ontological paradigm to represent knowledge of a patient's oral conditions and denture component parts. During the case-based reasoning process, a cosine similarity algorithm was applied to calculate similarity values between input patients and standard ontology cases. A group of designs from the most similar cases were output as the final results. To evaluate this model, the output designs of RPDs for 104 randomly selected patients were compared with those selected by professionals. An area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) was created by plotting true-positive rates against the false-positive rate at various threshold settings. The precision at position 5 of the retrieved cases was 0.67 and at the top of the curve it was 0.96, both of which are very high. The mean average of precision (MAP) was 0.61 and the normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG) was 0.74 both of which confirmed the efficient performance of our model. All the metrics demonstrated the efficiency of our model. This methodology merits further research development to match clinical applications for designing RPDs. This paper is organized as follows. After the introduction and description of the basis for the paper, the evaluation and results are presented in Section 2. Section 3 provides a discussion of the methodology and results. Section 4 describes the details of the ontology, similarity algorithm, and application.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesDenture, Partial, RemovableAlgorithmsDenture RetentionHumansKnowledge BasesNatural Language ProcessingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27297679
PMCPMC4906524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.