Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27297563›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2016

Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.

Marianne Grønnebæk Rhode, Mads Partridge Vandborg, Vibeke Bladt, Leif Rognås

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital helicopter emergency medicine recorded by video laryngoscopy.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Observational
  10. Comparing performance of video and direct laryngoscopy for pre-hospital intubation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne Grønnebæk RhodePrehospital Critical Care Service, Aarhus University Hospital, Oluf Palmes Alle 32, 1, Aarhus, N, 8200, Denmark. marrho@rm.dk.
Mads Partridge VandborgDepartment of Pre-hospital Critical Care Services, The Central Denmark Region, Oluf Palmes Alle 34, Aarhus, N, 8200, Denmark.
Vibeke BladtDepartment of Pre-hospital Critical Care Services, The Central Denmark Region, Oluf Palmes Alle 34, Aarhus, N, 8200, Denmark.
Leif RognåsPrehospital Critical Care Service, Aarhus University Hospital, Oluf Palmes Alle 32, 1, Aarhus, N, 8200, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCentral Denmark Region · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-hospital endotracheal intubation is challenging and repeated endotracheal intubation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether the introduction of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope as the primary device for pre-hospital endotracheal intubation could improve first-pass success rate in our anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital critical care services. We also investigated the incidence of failed pre-hospital endotracheal intubation, the use of airway adjuncts and back-up devices and problems encountered using the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope.

methodsProspective quality improvement study collecting data from all adult pre-hospital endotracheal intubation performed by four anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital critical care teams between December 15(th) 2013 and December 15(th) 2014.

resultsWe registered data from 273 consecutive patients. When using the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope the overall pre-hospital endotracheal intubation first-pass success rate was 80.8 %. Following rapid sequence intubation (RSI) it was 88.9 %. This was not significantly different from previously reported first-pass success rates in our system (p = 0.27 and p = 0.41). During the last nine months of the study period the overall first-pass success rate was 80.1 (p = 0.47) but the post-RSI first-pass success rate improved to 94.4 % (0.048). The overall pre-hospital endotracheal intubation success rate with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope was 98.9 % (p = 0.17). Gastric content, blood or secretion in the airway resulted in reduced vision when using the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope.

conclusionIn this study of video laryngoscope implementation in a Scandinavian anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital critical care service, overall pre-hospital endotracheal first pass success rate did not change. The post-RSI first-pass success rate was significantly higher during the last nine months of our 12-month study compared with our results from before introducing McGrath MAC video laryngoscope. The implementation of the Standard Operating Procedure and check list for pre-hospital anaesthesia during the study period may have influenced the first-pass success rate and constitutes a potential confounder. The potential limitations of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope when there are gastric content, blood and secretions in the airways need to be further investigated before the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope can be recommended as the primary device in all pre-hospital endotracheal intubations.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementVideo RecordingAdultCritical CareEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaryngoscopyMaleProspective StudiesTime FactorsDifficult endotracheal intubationEmergency medical servicesFirst-pass success rateMcGrath MACOut-of-hospitalPre-hospitalPrehospitalRapid sequence intubationvideo laryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID27297563
PMCPMC4906985
OpenAlexW2429252230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.