Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27297518›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Pester power and its consequences: do European children's food purchasing requests relate to diet and weight outcomes?

Christina Y Huang, Lucia A Reisch, Wencke Gwozdz, Dénes Molnár, Kenn Konstabel, Nathalie Michels, Michalis Tornaritis, Gabriele Eiben, Alfonso Siani, Juan M Fernández-Alvira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Children Learning About Secondhand Smoke (CLASS II): A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Children's Perceptions about Environmental Sustainability, Food, and Nutrition in Chile: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christina Y Huang1Pardee Rand Graduate School,Santa Monica,CA,USA.
Lucia A Reisch3Department of Intercultural Communication and Management,Copenhagen Business School,Solbjerg,Frederiksberg,Denmark.
Wencke Gwozdz3Department of Intercultural Communication and Management,Copenhagen Business School,Solbjerg,Frederiksberg,Denmark.
Dénes Molnár4Department of Paediatrics, Medical Faculty,University of Pécs,Budapest,Hungary.
Kenn Konstabel5National Institute for Health Development,Tallinn,Estonia.
Nathalie Michels6Department of Public Health,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Michalis Tornaritis7Research and Education Institute of Child Health,Strovolos,Cyprus.
Gabriele Eiben8Section for Epidemiology and Social Medicine,University of Gothenburg,PO Box 453,SE 405-30 Gothenburg,Sweden.
Alfonso Siani9Institute for Food Sciences,Unit of Epidemiology and Population Genetics,National Research Council,Avellino,Italy.
Juan M Fernández-Alvira10Growth,Exercise,Nutrition, and Development (GENUD) Research Group,University of Zaragoza,Zaragoza,Spain.
Wolfgang Ahrens11Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS GmbH,Bremen,Germany.
Iris Pigeot11Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS GmbH,Bremen,Germany.
Lauren Lissner8Section for Epidemiology and Social Medicine,University of Gothenburg,PO Box 453,SE 405-30 Gothenburg,Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChildren may influence household spending through 'pester power'. The present study examined pestering through parent-child food shopping behaviours in relation to children's diet and weight status.

designCross-sectional and prospective analyses drawn from the IDEFICS study, a cohort study of parents and their children. Children's height and weight were measured and their recent diets were reported by parental proxy based on the Children's Eating Habits Questionnaire-FFQ at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Parents also completed questionnaires at both time points about pestering, including whether the child goes grocery shopping with them, asks for items seen on television and is bought requested food items.

settingParticipants were recruited from eight European countries for the IDEFICS study (non-nationally representative sample). SUBJECTS: Study participants were children aged 2-9 years at enrolment and their parents. A total of 13 217 parent-child dyads were included at baseline. Two years later, 7820 of the children were re-examined.

resultsMost parents (63 %) at baseline reported 'sometimes' acquiescing to their children's requests to purchase specific foods. Pestering was modestly associated with weight and diet. At baseline, children whose parents 'often' complied consumed more high-sugar and high-fat foods. Children who 'often' asked for items seen on television were likely to become overweight after 2 years (OR=1·31), whereas 'never' asking protected against overweight (OR=0·72).

conclusionsPestering was modestly related to diet and weight in cross-sectional, but not longitudinal analyses. Asking for items seen on television had the most robust relationships across child outcomes and over time.

Indexed as

Body WeightConsumer BehaviorDietFood PreferencesAdvertisingBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleParentsProspective StudiesTelevisionChildrenMarketingObesityWeight

Identifiers

PMID27297518
PMCPMC10270966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.