Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27297479›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

New Insight into Daptomycin Bioavailability and Localization in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms by Dynamic Fluorescence Imaging.

Rym Boudjemaa, Romain Briandet, Matthieu Revest, Cédric Jacqueline, Jocelyne Caillon, Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart, Karine Steenkeste

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: a systematic review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Novel Peptide Antibiotic Produced byFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Direct observation of the cell-wall remodeling in adheringCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Morphological and Biological Characteristics ofMicrobial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Food-grade TiOJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Single microcolony diffusion analysis inNPJ biofilms and microbiomes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rym BoudjemaaInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France rym.boudjemaa@u-psud.fr.
Romain BriandetMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Matthieu RevestCHU Rennes, Rennes, France Université de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, UPRES EA 3826, Nantes, France.
Cédric JacquelineUniversité de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, UPRES EA 3826, Nantes, France.
Jocelyne CaillonUniversité de Nantes, Faculté de Médecine, UPRES EA 3826, Nantes, France.
Marie-Pierre Fontaine-AupartInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Karine SteenkesteInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Nantes Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most frequent pathogens responsible for biofilm-associated infections (BAI), and the choice of antibiotics to treat these infections remains a challenge for the medical community. In particular, daptomycin has been reported to fail against implant-associated S. aureus infections in clinical practice, while its association with rifampin remains a good candidate for BAI treatment. To improve our understanding of such resistance/tolerance toward daptomycin, we took advantage of the dynamic fluorescence imaging tools (time-lapse imaging and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching [FRAP]) to locally and accurately assess the antibiotic diffusion reaction in methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms. To provide a realistic representation of daptomycin action, we optimized an in vitro model built on the basis of our recently published in vivo mouse model of prosthetic vascular graft infections. We demonstrated that at therapeutic concentrations, daptomycin was inefficient in eradicating biofilms, while the matrix was not a shield to antibiotic diffusion and to its interaction with its bacterial target. In the presence of rifampin, daptomycin was still present in the vicinity of the bacterial cells, allowing prevention of the emergence of rifampin-resistant mutants. Conclusions derived from this study strongly suggest that S. aureus biofilm resistance/tolerance toward daptomycin may be more likely to be related to a physiological change involving structural modifications of the membrane, which is a strain-dependent process.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsDaptomycinDrug Resistance, BacterialFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRifampinStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinRifampin

Identifiers

PMID27297479
PMCPMC4958197
OpenAlexW2489660229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.