ArticleOncology research2016
Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Article in Oncology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism and chemosensitivity to platinum drugs in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2021Pooled it
- Resistance to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Physiopathologic and Pharmacologic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Novel Implications of MicroRNAs, Long Non-coding RNAs and Circular RNAs in Drug Resistance of Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0-4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.