Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27296861›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2016

Bovine coronavirus in naturally and experimentally exposed calves; viral shedding and the potential for transmission.

Veslemøy Sunniva Oma, Madeleine Tråvén, Stefan Alenius, Mette Myrmel, Maria Stokstad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Role ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Human Challenge Studies with Coronaviruses Old and New.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Veslemøy Sunniva OmaDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ullevålsvegen 72, 0454, Oslo, Norway. Veslemoy.Oma@nmbu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-7724
Madeleine TråvénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan AleniusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mette MyrmelDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ullevålsvegen 72, 0454, Oslo, Norway.
Maria StokstadDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ullevålsvegen 72, 0454, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine coronavirus (BCoV) is a widely distributed pathogen, causing disease and economic losses in the cattle industry worldwide. Prevention of virus spread is impeded by a lack of basic knowledge concerning viral shedding and transmission potential in individual animals. The aims of the study were to investigate the duration and quantity of BCoV shedding in feces and nasal secretions related to clinical signs, the presence of virus in blood and tissues and to test the hypothesis that seropositive calves are not infectious to naïve in-contact calves three weeks after BCoV infection.

methodsA live animal experiment was conducted, with direct contact between animal groups for 24 h as challenge procedure. Four naïve calves were commingled with a group of six naturally infected calves and sequentially euthanized. Two naïve sentinel calves were commingled with the experimentally exposed group three weeks after exposure. Nasal swabs, feces, blood and tissue samples were analyzed for viral RNA by RT-qPCR, and virus isolation was performed on nasal swabs. Serum was analyzed for BCoV antibodies.

resultsThe calves showed mild general signs, and the most prominent signs were from the respiratory system. The overall clinical score corresponded well with the shedding of viral RNA the first three weeks after challenge. General depression and cough were the signs that correlated best with shedding of BCoV RNA, while peak respiratory rate and peak rectal temperature appeared more than a week later than the peak shedding. Nasal shedding preceded fecal shedding, and the calves had detectable amounts of viral RNA intermittently in feces through day 35 and in nasal secretions through day 28, however virus isolation was unsuccessful from day six and day 18 from the two calves investigated. Viral RNA was not detected in blood, but was found in lymphatic tissue through day 42 after challenge. Although the calves were shedding BCoV RNA 21 days after infection the sentinel animals were not infected.

conclusionsProlonged shedding of BCoV RNA can occur, but detection of viral RNA does not necessarily indicate a transmission potential. The study provides valuable information with regard to producing scientifically based biosecurity advices.

Indexed as

Virus SheddingAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBloodBodily SecretionsCattleCattle DiseasesCoronavirus, BovineCoronavirus InfectionsDisease Transmission, InfectiousFecesNasal CavityReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralAntibodies, ViralRNA, ViralBCoVBCVBiosecurityClinical signsExperimental infectionRT-qPCRTransmission potentialViremiaVirus isolationVirus quantificationVirus shedding

Identifiers

PMID27296861
PMCPMC4906604
OpenAlexW2439267473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.