Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Alan T N TitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women׳s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: atita@uab.edu.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network
Funding
Data Coord Ctr-NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Maternal Medicine Units Research NetU10HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON, REBECCA GERSNOVIEZ · 2009 to 2021
$174.2M
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Pregnancy RegistryU24HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Rebecca Gersnoviez Clifton · 2021 to 2026
$39.2M
MATERNAL FETAL RESEARCH NETWORK: DATA COORDINATING CTRU01HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI THOM, ELIZABETH ANN · 1998 to 2008
$27.0M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD034116 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASEY, BRIAN M · 1996 to 2015
$19.3M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD034208 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VARNER, MICHAEL W. · 1996 to 2015
$16.6M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD027869 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TITA, ALAN THEVENET N. · 1991 to 2015
$12.8M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040485 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2001 to 2015
$12.5M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040560 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THORP, JOHN M · 2001 to 2015
$10.3M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040512 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2001 to 2015
$8.7M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD027917 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GONIK, BERNARD · 1991 to 2015
$8.2M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD027915 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI IAMS, JAY · 1992 to 2015
$7.7M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040545 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHAUHAN, SUNEET P · 2001 to 2015
The optimal timing of delivery in the setting of various clinical conditions and scenarios remains one of the most common questions for obstetric providers. Over the past 5-10 years, the optimal timing of delivery at term, particularly for elective repeat cesareans, has been the subject of considerable investigation and discussion. There is an increasing consensus that when women opt for an elective repeat cesarean delivery, it should be performed at term rather than preterm. The recent redefinition of the "term" period into early term (37-38 weeks), full-term (39-40 weeks), late term (41 weeks), and post term designations (≥42 weeks) underscores observed heterogeneity in outcomes following delivery at term. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends that elective repeat cesarean delivery be performed at full-term. Herein, the available data to support this recommendation regarding timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery are reviewed, including contributions from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network.
Indexed as
Cesarean SectionElective Surgical ProceduresGuideline AdherenceAdultEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalLength of StayParturitionPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRisk AssessmentEarly-term deliveryElective deliveryFull-term deliveryRepeat cesarean delivery
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
What we have learned about scheduling elective repeat cesarean delivery at term. · full record | OpenQuestion