Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27296566›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Burden of socio-legal concerns among vulnerable patients seeking cancer care services at an urban safety-net hospital: a cross-sectional survey.

Naomi Yu Ko, Tracy A Battaglia, Rebecca Gupta-Lawrence, Jessica Schiller, Christine Gunn, Kate Festa, Kerrie Nelson, JoHanna Flacks, Samantha J Morton, Jennifer E Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Housing and Cancer Care and Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naomi Yu KoSection of Hematology Oncology, Women's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. naomi.ko@bmc.org.
Tracy A BattagliaWomen's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Rebecca Gupta-LawrenceWomen's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Jessica SchillerWomen's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Christine GunnWomen's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Kate FestaWomen's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, First Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Kerrie NelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
JoHanna FlacksMedical-Legal Partnership I Boston, c/o Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP 155 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Samantha J MortonMedical-Legal Partnership I Boston, c/o Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP 155 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Jennifer E RosenDepartment of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street NW Suite G247C, Washington DC, 20010, USA.

Funding

The MB-CCOP at Boston Medical CenterU10CA139519 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI KACHNIC, LISA A. · 2010 to 2014
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA139519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial and economic conditions that affect one's ability to satisfy life's most basic needs such as lack of affordable housing, restricted access to education and employment, or inadequate income are increasingly well-documented barriers to optimal health. The burden of these challenges among vulnerable patients accessing cancer care services is unknown.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients presenting for ambulatory cancer care services (screening and treatment) at an urban safety-net hospital to assess socio-legal concerns (social problems related to meeting life's basic needs supported by public policy or programming and potentially remedied through legal advocacy/action).

resultsAmong 104 respondents, 80 (77 %) reported concerns with one or more socio-legal needs in the past month, with a mean of 5.75 concerns per participant. The most common socio-legal concerns related to income supports, housing, and employment/education.

conclusionOur findings support the need for innovations in cancer care delivery to address socio-legal concerns of a vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilitySafety-net ProvidersSocial Determinants of HealthSociological FactorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBostonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitals, UrbanHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsCancerDisparitiesLegal partnershipsSafety net

Identifiers

PMID27296566
PMCPMC4906581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.