Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27296390›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

Increases in Entamoeba histolytica Antibody-Positive Rates in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected and Noninfected Patients in Japan: A 10-Year Hospital-Based Study of 3,514 Patients.

Yasuaki Yanagawa, Naoyoshi Nagata, Koji Watanabe, Kunihisa Tsukada, Katsuji Teruya, Yoshimi Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Gatanaga, Junichi Akiyama, Naomi Uemura, Shinichi Oka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Features and Gut Microbiome of Asymptomatic Entamoeba histolytica Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seroprevalence ofBMJ open · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasuaki YanagawaCenter for AIDS Research, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Naoyoshi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji WatanabeDepartment of AIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihisa TsukadaDepartment of AIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuji TeruyaDepartment of AIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshimi KikuchiDepartment of AIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki GatanagaCenter for AIDS Research, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Junichi AkiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naomi UemuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Kohnodai Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Shinichi OkaCenter for AIDS Research, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological evidence of the epidemiological trends in Entamoeba histolytica infection is scarce, especially in nonendemic countries. We aimed to determine the antibody-positive rates over a 10-year period, and compare the trends between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and -noninfected patients. We reviewed 3,514 patients who underwent antibody testing during the study periods, which were divided into five annual categories: 2004-2005, 2006-2007, 2008-2009, 2010-2011, and 2012-2013. Anti-E. histolytica antibody was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence assay. The antibody-positive rate increased yearly from 2004-2005 to 2012-2013 (P < 0.001), although there was no increase in the annual number of antibody tests. This trend was seen among males (18.6-28.3%; P < 0.01), females (5.4-28.2%; P < 0.01), HIV-infected patients (18.4-26.9%; P < 0.001), and non-HIV-infected patients (14.6-36.8%; P < 0.001), and HIV-infected men who have sex with men (19.4-29.1%; P < 0.001). Among antibody-positive patients, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with high (≥ 1,600) titers (0.7-12.9%; P < 0.001), whereas this trend was not seen in patients with low (100) or intermediate (200-800) titers (P = 0.282 and 0.409, respectively). This large hospital-based study demonstrated that positive anti-E. histolytica antibody rates increased over 10 years, even though the annual number of antibody tests remained constant. Moreover, this trend was identified in non-high-risk patients (females and non-HIV-infected patients) as well as in high-risk patients. The proportion of patients with high antibody titers significantly increased among the antibody-positive patients.

Indexed as

Entamoeba histolyticaAdultAge FactorsAntibodies, ProtozoanCross-Sectional StudiesEntamoebiasisFemaleHIV InfectionsHospitalizationHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID27296390
PMCPMC5014266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.