Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27296040›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

IDEAL-CRT: A Phase 1/2 Trial of Isotoxic Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage II/III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

David B Landau, Laura Hughes, Angela Baker, Andrew T Bates, Michael C Bayne, Nicholas Counsell, Angel Garcia-Alonso, Susan V Harden, Jonathan D Hicks, Simon R Hughes and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. 4DCT and VMAT for lung patients with irregular breathing.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Investigation of the evolution of radiation-induced lung damage using serial CT imaging and pulmonary function tests.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of contour variability in target volumes and organs at risk in lung cancer radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

David B LandauGuy's & St. Thomas' NHS Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: david.landau@kcl.ac.uk.
Laura HughesCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Angela BakerClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
Andrew T BatesSouthampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Michael C BaynePoole Hospital, Poole, United Kingdom.
Nicholas CounsellCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Angel Garcia-AlonsoNorth Wales Cancer Centre, Rhyl, United Kingdom.
Susan V HardenAddenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan D HicksBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Simon R HughesGuy's & St. Thomas' NHS Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marianne C IllsleyRoyal Surrey County Hospital, Guilford, United Kingdom.
Iftekhar KhanCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Virginia LaurencePoole Hospital, Poole, United Kingdom.
Zafar MalikClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
Helen MaylesClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
William Philip M MaylesClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth MilesMount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Nazia MohammedBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Yenting NgaiCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Emma ParsonsMount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
James SpicerGuy's & St. Thomas' NHS Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paula WellsSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Dean WilkinsonMount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
John D FenwickUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cancer Research UK · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBPoole Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15953Cancer Research UK 17007Cancer Research UK C13530/A10424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report toxicity and early survival data for IDEAL-CRT, a trial of dose-escalated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients received tumor doses of 63 to 73 Gy in 30 once-daily fractions over 6 weeks with 2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin and vinorelbine. They were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to esophageal dose. In group 1, tumor doses were determined by an experimental constraint on maximum esophageal dose, which was escalated following a 6 + 6 design from 65 Gy through 68 Gy to 71 Gy, allowing an esophageal maximum tolerated dose to be determined from early and late toxicities. Tumor doses for group 2 patients were determined by other tissue constraints, often lung. Overall survival, progression-free survival, tumor response, and toxicity were evaluated for both groups combined.

resultsEight centers recruited 84 patients: 13, 12, and 10, respectively, in the 65-Gy, 68-Gy, and 71-Gy cohorts of group 1; and 49 in group 2. The mean prescribed tumor dose was 67.7 Gy. Five grade 3 esophagitis and 3 grade 3 pneumonitis events were observed across both groups. After 1 fatal esophageal perforation in the 71-Gy cohort, 68 Gy was declared the esophageal maximum tolerated dose. With a median follow-up of 35 months, median overall survival was 36.9 months, and overall survival and progression-free survival were 87.8% and 72.0%, respectively, at 1 year and 68.0% and 48.5% at 2 years.

conclusionsIDEAL-CRT achieved significant treatment intensification with acceptable toxicity and promising survival. The isotoxic design allowed the esophageal maximum tolerated dose to be identified from relatively few patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyComorbidityDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrevalenceRadiation Injuries

Identifiers

PMID27296040
PMCPMC4959796
OpenAlexW2313642049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.