Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27295335›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2016

Chronic Diseases and Use of Contraception Among Women at Risk of Unintended Pregnancy.

Ghasi S Phillips-Bell, William Sappenfield, Cheryl L Robbins, Leticia Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Online decision aids for contraceptive choices in women with chronic conditions: A systematic review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contraceptive use and pregnancy in cystic fibrosis: Survey findings from 10 cystic fibrosis centers.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghasi S Phillips-Bell1 Division of Community Health Promotion, Florida Department of Health , Tallahassee, Florida.
William Sappenfield3 College of Public Health, University of South Florida , Tampa, Florida.
Cheryl L Robbins2 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Leticia Hernandez1 Division of Community Health Promotion, Florida Department of Health , Tallahassee, Florida.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with chronic diseases are at increased risk of having unintended pregnancies. Little is known whether chronic diseases are associated with increased likelihood of effective/highly effective contraceptive use.

methodsWe analyzed 2008-2010 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data for women aged 18-44 years who were at risk of unintended pregnancy. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for contraceptive use in relation to diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and current asthma. We assessed the association of chronic disease status with use of three different contraception outcomes: (1) any method versus none, (2) less effective methods (methods associated with ≥10 unintended pregnancies/100 women/year) versus none, and (3) effective/highly effective methods (<10 unintended pregnancies/100 women/year) versus none.

resultsAmong 4473 women at risk for unintended pregnancy, 87% were using any method of contraception (22.5% less effective methods and 64.5% effective/highly effective methods). Women with CVD were more likely than those without CVD to use any contraception (aPR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.15), less effective (aPR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.70), and effective/highly effective (aPR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.19) contraception. Women with diabetes were more likely to use less effective methods than women without diabetes (aPR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.72). No significant associations were observed for asthma, regardless of contraceptive effectiveness.

conclusionsSelf-reported use of effective/highly effective contraception was higher than nonuse or use of less effective methods among all women at risk of unintended pregnancy, but could be improved, especially among women with chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseContraception BehaviorPregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemContraceptionContraceptive Prevalence SurveysCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFloridaHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancyPrevalenceRegression Analysiscardiovascular healthcontraceptiondiabetesepidemiologyreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID27295335
PMCPMC5154780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.