Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27295269›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2016

Outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AML and myelodysplastic syndrome in elderly patients (⩾60 years).

M Pohlen, C Groth, T Sauer, D Görlich, R Mesters, C Schliemann, G Lenz, C Müller-Tidow, T Büchner, W E Berdel and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Allotransplants for Patients 65 Years or Older with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M PohlenDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
C GrothDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
T SauerDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
D GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
R MestersDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
C SchliemannDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
G LenzDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
C Müller-TidowDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
T BüchnerDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
W E BerdelDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
M StelljesDepartment of Medicine A/Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the best curative option for patients with refractory AML or with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). For decades, age alone had been widely used as the primary criterion to assess eligibility for allogeneic SCT; however, prospective studies to evaluate allogeneic SCT in elderly patients are still limited. A total of 187 patients (median age of 64 years, range 60-77 years) with AML (87%) or MDS (13%) transplanted between 1999 and 2014 were included in this retrospective analysis. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 32% (95% confidence interval (CI): 25-39%) and 35% (95%CI: 27-42%), respectively. Overall survival was 49% (95%CI: 35-64%) in AML patients who were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), but even patients with active disease did benefit from transplantation, showing an OS at 3 years of 30% (95%CI: 20-40%). Multivariate analysis revealed disease- and patient-specific risk indices as independent prognostic factors for OS and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In conclusion, our monocenter results indicate that patients should not be generally withheld from allogeneic SCT because of age or disease status only. Specific risk models incorporating disease status and disease-specific risk factors at the time of transplantation as well as existing comorbidities are helpful tools to assess transplantation-associated risk factors of elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27295269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.