ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2017
3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional printing in radiation oncology: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Pooled it
- The "Pacman Flap with Tongue" for Secondary Orbital Reconstruction in Osteoradionecrosis: A Case Series.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The Rise of Intelligent Plastic Surgery: A 10-Year Bibliometric Journey Through AI Applications, Challenges, and Transformative Potential.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Accuracy of CAD/CAM planned mandibular reconstruction with scapula free flaps in reconstructive head and neck surgery - A single center study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- A Review of 3D-Printed Medical Devices for Cancer Radiation Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effect of artificial aging on fracture toughness and hardness of 3D-printed and milled 3Y-TZP zirconia.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Article
- Comparison of CAD/CAM and conventional microvascular free bone flaps in reconstructive head and neck surgery: a retrospective analysis of over 110 cases.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction Using Titanium Patient-Specific Implants: A Clinical and Radiological Cohort Study Focusing on Paranasal Sinuses Physiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Future Applications for 3-dimensional Printed Virtual Surgical Planning in Microsurgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Review
- Photochemical corneal cross-linking: Evaluating the potential of a hand-held biopen.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Medical 3D Printing Using Material Jetting: Technology Overview, Medical Applications, and Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of craniofacial implants in restoring facial function and aesthetics.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Stem Cells Within Three-Dimensional-Printed Scaffolds Facilitate Airway Mucosa and Bone Regeneration and Reconstruction of Maxillary Defects in Rabbits.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- 3D bioprinting the human chest wall: Fiction or fact.npj biomedical innovations · 2024Review
- Porous metal materials for applications in orthopedic field: A review on mechanisms in bone healing.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Review
- 3D printed OActa biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Bone reconstruction using CAD/CAM technology in head and neck surgical oncology. A narrative review of state of the art and aesthetic-functional outcomes.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024Review
- 3D Printing for the Development of Palatal Defect Prosthetics.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024Article
- Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024Review
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The treatment of craniofacial defects can present many challenges due to the variety of tissue-specific requirements and the complexity of anatomical structures in that region. 3D-printing technologies provide clinicians, engineers and scientists with the ability to create patient-specific solutions for craniofacial defects. Currently, there are three key strategies that utilize these technologies to restore both appearance and function to patients: rehabilitation, reconstruction and regeneration. In rehabilitation, 3D-printing can be used to create prostheses to replace or cover damaged tissues. Reconstruction, through plastic surgery, can also leverage 3D-printing technologies to create custom cutting guides, fixation devices, practice models and implanted medical devices to improve patient outcomes. Regeneration of tissue attempts to replace defects with biological materials. 3D-printing can be used to create either scaffolds or living, cellular constructs to signal tissue-forming cells to regenerate defect regions. By integrating these three approaches, 3D-printing technologies afford the opportunity to develop personalized treatment plans and design-driven manufacturing solutions to improve aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with craniofacial defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.