Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27294783›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2016

The dynamic interactome and genomic targets of Polycomb complexes during stem-cell differentiation.

Susan L Kloet, Matthew M Makowski, H Irem Baymaz, Lisa van Voorthuijsen, Ino D Karemaker, Alexandra Santanach, Pascal W T C Jansen, Luciano Di Croce, Michiel Vermeulen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Polycomb-mediated 3D chromatin interactions in gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EPOP and MTF2 activate PRC2 activity through DNA-sequence specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan L KloetDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Matthew M Makowski *Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H Irem Baymaz *Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisa van VoorthuijsenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ino D KaremakerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alexandra SantanachCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Pascal W T C JansenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luciano Di CroceCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Michiel VermeulenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESPompeu Fabra University · ES

Funding

European Research Council 309384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the core subunits of Polycomb group (PcG) complexes are well characterized, little is known about the dynamics of these protein complexes during cellular differentiation. We used quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling to study PcG proteins in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and neural progenitor cells (NPCs). We found that the stoichiometry and genome-wide binding of PRC1 and PRC2 were highly dynamic during neural differentiation. Intriguingly, we observed a downregulation and loss of PRC2 from chromatin marked with trimethylated histone H3 K27 (H3K27me3) during differentiation, whereas PRC1 was retained at these sites. Additionally, we found PRC1 at enhancer and promoter regions independently of PRC2 binding and H3K27me3. Finally, overexpression of NPC-specific PRC1 interactors in ESCs led to increased Ring1b binding to, and decreased expression of, NPC-enriched Ring1b-target genes. In summary, our integrative analyses uncovered dynamic PcG subcomplexes and their widespread colocalization with active chromatin marks during differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineChromatinChromatography, LiquidChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHistonesMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsPolycomb-Group ProteinsProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsSignal TransductionChromatinHistonesPolycomb-Group Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27294783
PMCPMC4939079
OpenAlexW2412491965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.