ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2016
Incremental learning of perceptual and conceptual representations and the puzzle of neural repetition suppression.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training in the Categorization of Aerial and Terrestrial Scenes Differentially Impacts Scene-Selective and Nonscene-Selective Regions in Occipitotemporal Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Evidence for hierarchical representations of written and spoken words from an open-science human neuroimaging dataset.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Distinct deficits of repetition priming following lateral versus anteromedial frontal cortex damage.Neuropsychologia · 2022Article
- Enhanced inter-regional coupling of neural responses and repetition suppression provide separate contributions to long-term behavioral priming.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Changes in human brain dynamics during behavioral priming and repetition suppression.Progress in neurobiology · 2020Article
- Forgotten but not gone: FMRI evidence of implicit memory for negative stimuli 24 hours after the initial study episode.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Rehearsal initiates systems memory consolidation, sleep makes it last.Science advances · 2019Article
- Modeling the N400 ERP component as transient semantic over-activation within a neural network model of word comprehension.Cognition · 2017Article
- On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016Review
- Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incremental learning models of long-term perceptual and conceptual knowledge hold that neural representations are gradually acquired over many individual experiences via Hebbian-like activity-dependent synaptic plasticity across cortical connections of the brain. In such models, variation in task relevance of information, anatomic constraints, and the statistics of sensory inputs and motor outputs lead to qualitative alterations in the nature of representations that are acquired. Here, the proposal that behavioral repetition priming and neural repetition suppression effects are empirical markers of incremental learning in the cortex is discussed, and research results that both support and challenge this position are reviewed. Discussion is focused on a recent fMRI-adaptation study from our laboratory that shows decoupling of experience-dependent changes in neural tuning, priming, and repetition suppression, with representational changes that appear to work counter to the explicit task demands. Finally, critical experiments that may help to clarify and resolve current challenges are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27294423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.