Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27294357›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Osteopontin in cerebrospinal fluid as diagnostic biomarker for central nervous system lymphoma.

Felicitas Strehlow, Sandra Bauer, Peter Martus, Michael Weller, Patrick Roth, Uwe Schlegel, Sabine Seidel, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Agnieszka Korfel, Stephan Kreher

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TheNeural regeneration research · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Felicitas StrehlowDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
Sandra BauerDepartment of Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrick RothDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Uwe SchlegelDepartment of Neurology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sabine SeidelDepartment of Neurology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Carmen ScheibenbogenDepartment of Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Agnieszka KorfelDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan KreherDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany. stephan.kreher@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8948-8297
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHFranklin University · USUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is diagnostically challenging. The identification of reliable and easy to measure biomarkers is desirable to facilitate diagnosis. Here, we evaluated the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) osteopontin (OPN) as a diagnostic biomarker for CNSL. OPN concentrations in CSF from 37 patients with CNSL (29 with primary CNSL and 8 with secondary CNS involvement of systemic lymphoma) and 36 controls [6 patients with inflammatory CNS disease other than multiple sclerosis (MS), 8 with MS, 9 with glioblastoma (GBM) and 13 healthy controls] were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Non-parametric tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed for determination of diagnostic accuracy. Median CSF OPN level in all CNSL patients was 620 ng/mL and higher than in patients with inflammatory CNS disease (356 ng/mL); P < .05, MS (163 ng/mL); P < .01, GBM (41 ng/mL); P < .01, or healthy controls (319 ng/mL); P < .01. The area under the ROC curve was 0.865 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.745-0.985] for differentiating CNSL and patients with inflammatory CNS disease; 0.956 (95 % CI 0.898-1.000) for CNSL and MS patients; 0.988 (95 % CI 0.964-1.000) for CNSL and GBM patients, and 0.915 (95 % CI 0.834-0.996) for CNSL patients and healthy controls. In multivariate analysis, high CSF OPN level was associated with shorter progression-free (HR 1.61, 95 % CI 1.13-2.31; P = .009) and overall survival (HR 1.52, 95 % CI 1.04-2.21; P = .029). CSF OPN is a potential biomarker in CNSL.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedOsteopontinROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorOsteopontinSPP1 protein, humanCerebrospinal fluidOsteopontinPCNSLSCNSL

Identifiers

PMID27294357
OpenAlexW2443009885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.