ArticleLeukemia research2016
Romidepsin enhances the cytotoxicity of fludarabine, clofarabine and busulfan combination in malignant T-cells.
Article in Leukemia research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic cytotoxicity of fludarabine, clofarabine, busulfan, vorinostat and olaparib in AML cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Compensatory combination of romidepsin with gemcitabine and cisplatin to effectively and safely control urothelial carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Novel approaches to pre-transplant conditioning are needed to improve treatment of advanced T-cell malignancies. We investigated the synergism of fludarabine (Flu), clofarabine (Clo), busulfan (Bu), and romidepsin (Rom) in T-cell lines and patient-derived cell samples. [Flu+Clo+Bu+Rom] had combination indexes of 0.4-0.5 at ∼50% cytotoxicity in PEER and SUPT1 cells, suggesting synergism. Drug exposure resulted in histone modifications, DNA-damage response (DDR), increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), decreased glutathione (GSH) and mitochondrial membrane (MM) potential, and apoptosis. Similar activation of DDR and apoptosis was observed in patient samples. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR, NFκB, Raf-MEK-ERK, JAK-STAT and Wnt/β-catenin pro-survival pathways were inhibited by the 4-drug combination. The SAPK/JNK stress pathway was activated. A novel finding was the down-regulation of the drug transporter MRP1. We propose the following mechanisms of synergism: Flu, Clo and Rom induce histone modifications and chromatin remodeling, exposing DNA to Bu alkylation; the increased production of ROS, due to drug-mediated stress response and decreased GSH, damages the MM causing leakage of pro-apoptotic factors; down-regulation of MRP1 increases intracellular Bu concentration and exacerbates the DDR; and inhibition of multiple survival pathways. Our results provide the basis for a clinical trial to evaluate [Flu+Clo+Bu+Rom] as part of conditioning regimen for refractory T-cell malignancy patients undergoing stem cell transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.