Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27294270›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2016

[Clinical diagnosis and drug therapy of elderly patients with schizophrenia : A restrospective analysis of data in a department of old age psychiatry].

Christian Jagsch, Gabriele Dietmaier, Maximilian Jagsch, Martin Kurz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian JagschAbteilung für Alterspsychiatrie und Alterspsychotherapie, LKH Graz Süd-West, Wagner Jauregg Platz 1, 8053, Graz, Österreich. christian.jagsch@kages.at.
Gabriele DietmaierPsychosoziale Beratungsstelle des GFSG, Hartberg, Österreich.
Maximilian JagschFH Technikum, Wien, Österreich.
Martin KurzFachbereich Psychiatrie, Krankenhaus St. Vinzenz, Zams, Österreich.
Altrecht GGZ · NLFonds Gesundes Österreich · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to survey the consistency of the clinical diagnostics and the psychopharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and delusional disorders suffered by older persons. A further aspect was to record significant clinical differences and also similarities between the patient groups in care, matching with the criteria of ICD 10 for schizophrenia (F20), persistent delusional disorders (F22) and schizoaffective disorder (F25).

methodsRetrospective analysis with reference to the manually and electronically recorded patient medical records of an acute case care ward for geriatric psychiatry and psychotherapy.

resultsDuring the assessment period 210 patients over the age of 65 years were included consecutively in the study (F20 - 64 patients, F22 - 78 patients, F25 - 64 patients, 4 patients died). Ignoring the fact that many of the patients were admitted without a diagnosis, the diagnostic classification of the referring doctor, above all those made by general practitioners, proved to be very consistent for the groups F20 and F25. In the group F22 diagnoses, however, up to almost one half of the referred patients were incorrectly admitted with an F20 diagnosis. The patients included in group F22 formed a heterogeneous group, or a melting pot for various sub-groups, with the common shared characteristic of being comprised of persons suffering from a delusional disorder. These differed from the other two groups in the following attributes: the patients were either older or very old persons, they were mostly receiving inpatient treatment for the first time and subsequently had fewer re-admissions. They also suffered more frequently from both psychiatric and somatic comorbidities; furthermore they included elderly people who had suffered from learning deficiencies or borderline intellectual deficiencies throughout their earlier lives. The patients in groups F20 and F25 differed primarily only in terms of their psychiatric medication, with significantly more mood stabilizer prescribed in the F25 group. Patients in all three groups frequently received tranquilisers during the day and sedatives in the evening, atypical antipsychotics were prescribed in the great majority of cases.

conclusionThe referral diagnoses of patients suffering from many years of schizophrenic type illnesses were largely in compliance with the diagnostic criteria, a much more difficult issue for the referring doctors was the allocation of patients with a first occurrence of delusional symptoms. Those patients who were allocated to the diagnostic group schizophrenia differed significantly from patients from the group with delusional disorders.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAgedAge FactorsAntipsychotic AgentsAustriaDelusionsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMalePsychiatric Department, HospitalRetrospective StudiesSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsClinical diagnosticDelusional disorderElderly patientsPsychotropic drugsSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID27294270
OpenAlexW2441866099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.