Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27294145›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2016

miR-155 as a Biomarker in B-Cell Malignancies.

Hanne Due, Pernille Svendsen, Julie Støve Bødker, Alexander Schmitz, Martin Bøgsted, Hans Erik Johnsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Anne Stidsholt Roug, Karen Dybkær

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hanne DueDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Pernille SvendsenDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Julie Støve BødkerDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Alexander SchmitzDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin BøgstedDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Hans Erik JohnsenDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Tarec Christoffer El-GalalyDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Stidsholt RougDepartment of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Karen DybkærDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs have the potential to be useful biomarkers in the development of individualized treatment since they are easy to detect, are relatively stable during sample handling, and are important determinants of cellular processes controlling pathogenesis, progression, and response to treatment of several types of cancers including B-cell malignancies. miR-155 is an oncomiR with a crucial role in tumor initiation and development of several B-cell malignancies. The present review elucidates the potential of miR-155 as a diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive biomarker in B-cell malignancies using a systematic search strategy to identify relevant literature. miR-155 was upregulated in several malignancies compared to nonmalignant controls and overexpression of miR-155 was further associated with poor prognosis. Elevated expression of miR-155 shows potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo studies suggest miR-155 as an efficient therapeutic target, supporting its oncogenic function. The use of inhibiting anti-miR structures indicates promising potential as novel anticancer therapeutics. Reports from 53 studies prove that miR-155 has the potential to be a molecular tool in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLymphoma, B-CellMaleMicroRNAsPrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN155 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID27294145
PMCPMC4884835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.