ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2016
The clinics of acute coronary syndrome.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for adult patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023Review
- LncRNA SNHG8 is identified as a key regulator of acute myocardial infarction by RNA-seq analysis.Lipids in health and disease · 2019Article
- MiR-153 regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis by targeting Nrf2/HO-1 signaling.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2019Article
- Induced by infection? A case of acute myocardial infarction with hypothermia.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- Combination of Platelet expression of PKCepsilon and cardiac troponin-I for early diagnosis of chest pain patients in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives.Vascular health and risk management · 2019Review
- Association of Circulating IGFBP1 Level with the Severity of Coronary Artery Lesions in Patients with Unstable Angina.Disease markers · 2017Article
- Clinical perception and simple laboratory tests: do not mistake the finger pointing at the moon.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Red blood cell distribution width independently predicts medium-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events after an acute coronary syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Predictive significance of detectable cardiac troponin I measured with a contemporary-sensitive assay in a real life experience.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing in routine practice: economic and organizational advantages.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another?Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Acute coronary syndrome: many doubts, some answers.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Differences in symptoms and presentation delay times in myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes: A cross-sectional study in Pakistan.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk stratification and management of patients with chest pain continues to be challenging despite considerable efforts made in the last decades by many clinicians and researchers. The throutful evaluation necessitates that the physicians have a high index of suspicion for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and always keep in mind the myriad of often subtle and atypical presentations of ischemic heart disease, especially in certain patient populations such as the elderly ones. In this article we aim to review and discuss the available evidence on the value of clinical presentation in patients with a suspected ACS, with special emphasis on history, characteristics of chest pain, associated symptoms, atypical presentations, precipitating and relieving factors, drugs, clinical rules and significance of clinical Gestalt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.