Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27294035›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2016

The use of the Alexis(®) device in breast augmentation to improve outcomes: a comparative randomized case-control survey.

Luca Andrea Dessy, Nefer Fallico, Francesco Serratore, Diego Ribuffo, Marco Mazzocchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wound protectors for improved exposure in open hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca Andrea Dessy1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Via S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.
Nefer Fallico1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Via S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.
Francesco Serratore1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Via S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.
Diego Ribuffo1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Via S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.
Marco Mazzocchi1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy ; 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Perugia, Via S. Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe present our experience in using a disposable wound retractor commonly used in abdominal surgery named Alexis(®) (Applied Medical Resources Corporation, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA), during breast augmentation in order to improve outcomes, particularly final scar length.

methodsBetween January 2010 and November 2012, 40 patients undergoing breast augmentation with an inframammary approach were enrolled in the present study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 underwent breast augmentation with the standard technique; group 2 underwent breast augmentation by using the Alexis(®) (Applied Medical Resources Corporation) device. Patients were followed-up for a 12-month period. The time of surgery, the days of drain duration and the length of the incisions were recorded for both groups and statistical significance was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Also, final scar appearance was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

resultsPatients in group 2 reported a lower incidence of hematomas and had shorter drain duration. The difference in scar length between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Surgeons and patients were mostly satisfied with the final appearance of the scar.

conclusionsThe use of the Alexis(®) (Applied Medical Resources Corporation) device has proven useful in reducing the length of the inframammary incision. Interestingly, the increased visibility obtained with the use of the Alexis device allowed a better hemostasis, as suggested by the shorter drain duration and lower incidence of hematomas. However, its use prolongs the operative time, for which we recommend surgeons to allow themselves some time to become familiar with the device. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level I, evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Alexis® devicebreast augmentation

Identifiers

PMID27294035
PMCPMC4884688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.