ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2016
Why a second look might be worth it: immuno-modulatory therapies in the critically ill patient.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Levosimendan vs. Dobutamine in Patients with Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cytokine storm and COVID-19: a chronicle of pro-inflammatory cytokines.Open biology · 2020Review
- Risk factors for early viral infections after liver transplantation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Article
- Ablation of the Right Cardiac Vagus Nerve Reduces Acetylcholine Content without Changing the Inflammatory Response during Endotoxemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation by regulating PAI-1 expression.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and septic shock are associated with high mortality rates and remain a serious menace for the critically ill patient. Concurrent activation of pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways and an excessive cytokine release represent initial key features in the deregulation of the humoral and cellular antimicrobial defense. Research of the last decades addressed both the ebullient inflammation as well as the resulting long-term failure of the host immunity. While the reestablishment of an adequate immune-competence is still under investigation, many promising experimental trials to limit the inflammatory response during sepsis were challenged by missing beneficial effects in clinical studies. Nevertheless, due to advanced knowledge about the complex regulation of inflammatory mediators and their overlapping involvement in other potentially life-threatening diseases, further evaluation of these approaches in relevant subgroups could help to identify critically ill patients with potential benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.