Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293668›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2014

A product of its environment: the epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum) exhibits physiological tolerance to elevated environmental CO2.

Dennis D U Heinrich, Jodie L Rummer, Andrea J Morash, Sue-Ann Watson, Colin A Simpfendorfer, Michelle R Heupel, Philip L Munday

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spiny dogfish,Conservation physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The endemic and endangered Maugean Skate (Conservation physiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis D U HeinrichSchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Jodie L RummerARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Andrea J MorashUniversity of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Sue-Ann WatsonSchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Colin A SimpfendorferCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, School of Earth and Environmental Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Michelle R HeupelCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, School of Earth and Environmental Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia.
Philip L MundaySchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
James Cook University · AUARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies · AUAustralian Institute of Marine Science · AUInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocean acidification, resulting from increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions, is predicted to affect the physiological performance of many marine species. Recent studies have shown substantial reductions in aerobic performance in some teleost fish species, but no change or even enhanced performance in others. Notably lacking, however, are studies on the effects of near-future CO2 conditions on larger meso and apex predators, such as elasmobranchs. The epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum) lives on shallow coral reef flats and in lagoons, where it may frequently encounter short-term periods of environmental hypoxia and elevated CO2, especially during nocturnal low tides. Indeed, H. ocellatum is remarkably tolerant to short periods (hours) of hypoxia, and possibly hypercapnia, but nothing is known about its response to prolonged exposure. We exposed H. ocellatum individuals to control (390 µatm) or one of two near-future CO2 treatments (600 or 880 µatm) for a minimum of 60 days and then measured key aspects of their respiratory physiology, namely the resting oxygen consumption rate, which is used to estimate resting metabolic rate, and critical oxygen tension, a proxy for hypoxia sensitivity. Neither of these respiratory attributes was affected by the long-term exposure to elevated CO2. Furthermore, there was no change in citrate synthase activity, a cellular indicator of aerobic energy production. Plasma bicarbonate concentrations were significantly elevated in sharks exposed to 600 and 880 µatm CO2 treatments, indicating that acidosis was probably prevented by regulatory changes in acid-base relevant ions. Epaulette sharks may therefore possess adaptations that confer tolerance to CO2 levels projected to occur in the ocean by the end of this century. It remains uncertain whether other elasmobranchs, especially pelagic species that do not experience such diurnal fluctuations in their environment, will be equally tolerant.

Indexed as

Climate changeecophysiologyelasmobranchhypoxia toleranceocean acidification

Identifiers

PMID27293668
PMCPMC4806737
OpenAlexW2116061920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.