Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293644›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2014

Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?

Ben Dantzer, Quinn E Fletcher, Rudy Boonstra, Michael J Sheriff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An experimental approach to assess the combined effects of multiple stressors on a large vertebrate species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Tracking the Pulse of the Dunes: Seasonal Metabolic Responses of Liolaemus arambarensis to Climatic Variability.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) as a tool for conservation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Non-Invasive Assessment of Adrenal Activity in the Subterranean RodentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Stress, Well-Being, and Reproduction in Wildlife.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben DantzerDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Quinn E FletcherDépartement de biologie, chimie et geographie, Université du Québec á Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada G5L 3A1.
Rudy BoonstraCentre for the Neurobiology of Stress, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada M1C 1A4.
Michael J SheriffDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16801, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation physiology proposes that measures of physiological stress (glucocorticoid levels) can be used to assess the status and future fate of natural populations. Increases in glucocorticoids may reflect a more challenging environment, suggesting that the influence of human activities on free-living animals could be quantified by measuring glucocorticoids. Biomedical studies suggest that chronic increases in glucocorticoids can have detrimental effects on survival and reproduction, which could influence the viability of populations. Here, we discuss the use of measurements of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology. We first provide an overview of the different methods to quantify glucocorticoids and their utility in conservation physiology. We then discuss five questions we think are essential for conservation physiologists to address. We highlight how intrinsic (e.g. sex, reproductive status, age, recent experiences) and ecological factors (e.g. predation, food availability, snowfall) can, by themselves or through their interactions with anthropogenic disturbances, affect the physiological stress response and mask any general patterns about the effects of anthropogenic disturbances on glucocorticoids. Using a meta-analysis, we show that anthropogenic disturbances are consistently associated with increased glucocorticoids regardless of the type of human disturbance. We also show that males may be more sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances than females and that faecal glucocorticoids, but not baseline plasma glucocorticoids, consistently increase in response to anthropogenic disturbances. Finally, we discuss how increases in glucocorticoids in free-living animals can sometimes enhance survival and reproduction. Unfortunately, our literature analysis indicates that this observation has not yet gained traction, and very few studies have shown that increases in glucocorticoid levels resulting from anthropogenic disturbances decrease survival or reproduction. We think that the use of measures of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology has tremendous potential, but there are still a number of methodological concerns, in addition to several crucial questions that should be addressed.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic disturbancebiodiversityconservation physiologyfitnessmeta-analysisstress

Identifiers

PMID27293644
PMCPMC4732472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.