Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293590›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2013

Overcoming the challenges of studying conservation physiology in large whales: a review of available methods.

Kathleen E Hunt, Michael J Moore, Rosalind M Rolland, Nicholas M Kellar, Ailsa J Hall, Joanna Kershaw, Stephen A Raverty, Cristina E Davis, Laura C Yeates, Deborah A Fauquier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An experimental approach to assess the combined effects of multiple stressors on a large vertebrate species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Successful Rescue of a Juvenile Humpback Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  12. Respiration rates and inferred mass-specific field metabolic rates decline with body size among five sympatric cetaceans.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Astrocyte properties in cetacean cortices.Physiological reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Closing the air gap: the use of drones for studying wildlife ecophysiology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathleen E HuntJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, Research Department, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Michael J MooreBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Insitution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
Rosalind M RollandJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, Research Department, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Nicholas M KellarSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Ailsa J HallSea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
Joanna KershawSea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
Stephen A RavertyAnimal Health Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada V6M 1A2.
Cristina E DavisMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Laura C YeatesNational Marine Mammal Foundation, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.
Deborah A FauquierMarine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Teresa K RowlesMarine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Scott D KrausJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, Research Department, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA ;
New England Aquarium · USNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · USScottish Association For Marine Science · GBAbbotsford Veterinary Clinic · CANational Marine Mammal Foundation · USNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · US

Funding

UC DAVIS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER: BPCAUL1RR024146 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$27.0M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large whales are subjected to a variety of conservation pressures that could be better monitored and managed if physiological information could be gathered readily from free-swimming whales. However, traditional approaches to studying physiology have been impractical for large whales, because there is no routine method for capture of the largest species and there is presently no practical method of obtaining blood samples from free-swimming whales. We review the currently available techniques for gathering physiological information on large whales using a variety of non-lethal and minimally invasive (or non-invasive) sample matrices. We focus on methods that should produce information relevant to conservation physiology, e.g. measures relevant to stress physiology, reproductive status, nutritional status, immune response, health, and disease. The following four types of samples are discussed: faecal samples, respiratory samples ('blow'), skin/blubber samples, and photographs. Faecal samples have historically been used for diet analysis but increasingly are also used for hormonal analyses, as well as for assessment of exposure to toxins, pollutants, and parasites. Blow samples contain many hormones as well as respiratory microbes, a diverse array of metabolites, and a variety of immune-related substances. Biopsy dart samples are widely used for genetic, contaminant, and fatty-acid analyses and are now being used for endocrine studies along with proteomic and transcriptomic approaches. Photographic analyses have benefited from recently developed quantitative techniques allowing assessment of skin condition, ectoparasite load, and nutritional status, along with wounds and scars from ship strikes and fishing gear entanglement. Field application of these techniques has the potential to improve our understanding of the physiology of large whales greatly, better enabling assessment of the relative impacts of many anthropogenic and ecological pressures.

Indexed as

biopsy dartBlowCetaceafaecal samplesnon-invasivevisual health assessment

Identifiers

PMID27293590
PMCPMC4806609
OpenAlexW2120864004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.