ArticleConservation physiology2013
Characterization of Na(+) uptake in the endangered desert pupfish, Cyprinodon macularius (Baird and Girard).
Article in Conservation physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiology mediates transcontinental radiations of freshwater fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Conservation physiology today and tomorrow.Conservation physiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provided an initial characterization of Na(+) uptake in saline freshwater by the endangered pupfish, Cyprinodon macularius. This species occurs only in several saline water systems in the southwestern USA and northern Mexico, where salinity is largely controlled by water-management practices. Consequently, understanding the osmoregulatory capacity of this species is important for their conservation. The lower acclimation limit of C. macularius in freshwater was found to be 2 mM Na(+). Fish acclimated to 2 or 7 mM Na(+) displayed similar Na(+) uptake kinetics, with K m values of 4321 and 3672 μM and V max values of 4771 and 3602 nmol g(-1) h(-1), respectively. A series of experiments using pharmacological inhibitors indicated that Na(+) uptake in C. macularius was not sensitive to bumetanide, metolazone, or phenamil. These results indicate the Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) cotransporter, Na(+)-Cl(-) cotransporter, and the Na(+) channel-H(+)-ATPase system are likely not to be involved in Na(+) uptake at the apical membrane of fish gill ionocytes in fish acclimated to 2 or 7 mM Na(+). However, Na(+) uptake was sensitive to 1 × 10(-3) M amiloride (not 1 × 10(-4) or 1 × 10(-5) M), 5-(N-ethyl-N-isopropyl)-amiloride (EIPA), and ethoxzolamide. These data suggest that C. macularius relies on a low-affinity Na(+)-H(+) exchanger for apical Na(+) uptake and that H(+) ions generated via carbonic anhydrase-mediated CO2 hydration are important for the function of this protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.