ArticleClinical kidney journal2013
A single-centre retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in children and adolescents with nephrotic syndrome.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pursuing the optimal strategy for immunosuppression discontinuation in children treated with rituximab for frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Immune mechanisms and immunomodulatory therapies in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Infection risk in patients with autoimmune cytopenias and immune dysregulation treated with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in graves ophthalmopathy medical therapy: a comprehensive literature review.International ophthalmology · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 mediated lung inflammatory responses in host: targeting the cytokine storm for therapeutic interventions.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Review
- The safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in children and adolescents with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a single-centre study.Clinical kidney journal · 2020Article
- Mycophenolate mofetil for sustained remission in nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Article
- Fighting the Host Reaction to SARS-COv-2 in Critically Ill Patients: The Possible Contribution of Off-Label Drugs.Frontiers in immunologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and side effect profile of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS).
methodsA retrospective case note review was performed on all patients with NS who were commenced on MMF between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2009 and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year.
resultsThe sample size was 73 patients. The duration of follow-up was for a median of 3.2 years, interquartile range (IQR) (1.7-4.7 years). The median age at diagnosis was 3.2 years, IQR (2.3-5.7 years). The median age of MMF commencement was 11 years, IQR (7.9-13.6 years). There were more boys (67%) than girls. The majority were Caucasian (77%), with 18% Asian 4%, Black Africans and 1% other ethnicities. At initial diagnosis, 61 (84%) were steroid sensitive, 9 (12%) steroid resistant, 3 (4%) steroid dependent (SD). Forty-five (74%) of the 61 steroid-sensitive patients became SD, 4 (7%) of them became steroid resistant, 1 (1%) remained steroid-sensitive and 11 (18%) became frequent relapsers. As to the previous use of second-line immunosuppressants, none were used in 5 (7%) patients, one agent in 17 (23%), two in 27 (37%) and three or more agents were used in 23 (32%) patients. MMF was effective in 45 (62%) patients. Of these, 38 (52%) of them were in remission for >2 years; and in 7 (10%) MMF worked for 1 to 2 years (MMF therapy electively stopped/ongoing). MMF therapy allowed 27 (37%) patients to wean steroids completely and 8 (11%) to achieve complete steroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal. A further 8 (11%) had steroids partially weaned. MMF failures were seen in 13 (18%) within the first year and 5 (7%) in the second year. MMF was stopped due to side effects in 4 (6%) and non-compliance in 4 (6%). The majority of patients had no side effects [51 (70%)]. Seven (9%) had gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhoea/abdominal pain); 5 (7%) had immunological side effects (leucopenia/infections); 3 (4%) had both immunological and gastrointestinal side effects; and 2 (3%) suffered arthralgia.
conclusionsMMF is well tolerated and effective as a second-line agent in treating steroid-sensitive NS. The drug permitted prolonged remission and steroid weaning or other second-line agent withdrawal in a majority of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.