Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293234›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Students' Attitudes, Academic Performance and Preferences for Content Delivery in a Very Large Self-Care Course Redesign.

Lana Dvorkin Camiel, Amee Mistry, David Schnee, Gary Tataronis, Catherine Taglieri, Kathy Zaiken, Dhiren Patel, Stefanie Nigro, Susan Jacobson, Jennifer Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Flipped classrooms in pharmacy education: A systematic review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Review
  2. Community pharmacies and the empowerment of self-care in the United States.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lana Dvorkin CamielMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Amee MistryMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
David SchneeMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gary TataronisMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Catherine TaglieriMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathy ZaikenMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dhiren PatelMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stefanie NigroMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan JacobsonMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer GoldmanMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate students' performance/attitudes toward a flipped team-based learning (TBL) format in a "very large" self-care course based on student content delivery preference. Design. Third-year students enrolled in the course were surveyed regarding elements of redesign and homework completion. Additionally, their performance and incoming grade point average were evaluated. Assessment. A survey was completed by 286 of 305 students. Nineteen percent of respondents preferred traditional content delivery, whereas 30% preferred flipped TBL, 48% preferred a mixed format, and 3% had no preference. The grades achieved in the course were: A (49%), B (48%), C (3%) and D (0%). The majority completed "all" or "most" of the homework, appreciated attributes of course redesign, felt home preparation and in-class activities engaged them, and reported improved communication/evaluation skills. Content delivery preference significantly affected attitudes. Conclusion. Students positively received a flipped team-based learning classroom format, especially those who preferred flipped TBL or mixed content delivery. A minority with preference for traditional teaching style did not enjoy the new format; however, their academic performance did not differ significantly from those who did.

Indexed as

AttitudeCurriculumSelf CareEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyFemaleHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningStudents, PharmacyYoung Adultcontent deliveryflipped classroomlarge classroomself-careteam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID27293234
PMCPMC4891865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.