Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293201›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2016

The Shape of the Glucose Response Curve During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Heralds Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Obese Youth.

Joon Young Kim, Sara F Michaliszyn, Alexis Nasr, SoJung Lee, Hala Tfayli, Tamara Hannon, Kara S Hughan, Fida Bacha, Silva Arslanian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joon Young KimDivision of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sara F MichaliszynHuman Performance and Exercise Science, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH.
Alexis NasrDivision of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
SoJung LeeDivision of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Hala TfayliDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tamara HannonSections of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, and Pediatric Comparative Effectiveness Research, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Kara S HughanDivision of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes Mellitus, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Fida BachaChildren's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Silva ArslanianDivision of Weight Management and Wellness, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes Mellitus, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA silva.arslanian@chp.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBChildren's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USYoungstown State University · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
CHILDHOOD METABOLIC MARKERS OF ADULT MORBIDITY IN BLACKSR01HD027503 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ARSLANIAN, SILVA A · 1997 to 2009
$2.1M
INSULIN RESISTANCE IN CHILDHOODK24HD001357 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ARSLANIAN, SILVA A · 2000 to 2011
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD001357NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD027503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clamp-measured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity.

resultsDespite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity.

conclusionsIn obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Indexed as

Glucose Tolerance TestAdiposityAdolescentBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBody CompositionBody Mass IndexC-PeptideCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glycated HemoglobinHumansBiomarkersBlood GlucoseC-PeptideGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glycated HemoglobinIncretinsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID27293201
PMCPMC4955931
OpenAlexW2414904515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.