Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27293188›Full record

ArticleCell2016

Forces Driving Chaperone Action.

Philipp Koldewey, Frederick Stull, Scott Horowitz, Raoul Martin, James C A Bardwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Making Proteins with Electricity.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Characterization of clumpy adhesion ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interface engineering of cellobiose dehydrogenase improves interdomain electron transfer.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philipp KoldeweyDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Frederick StullDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Scott HorowitzDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Raoul MartinDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
James C A BardwellDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: jbardwel@umich.edu.

Funding

Mechanism of an Acid Activated ChaperoneR01GM102829 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARDWELL, JAMES, JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is still unclear what molecular forces drive chaperone-mediated protein folding. Here, we obtain a detailed mechanistic understanding of the forces that dictate the four key steps of chaperone-client interaction: initial binding, complex stabilization, folding, and release. Contrary to the common belief that chaperones recognize unfolding intermediates by their hydrophobic nature, we discover that the model chaperone Spy uses long-range electrostatic interactions to rapidly bind to its unfolded client protein Im7. Short-range hydrophobic interactions follow, which serve to stabilize the complex. Hydrophobic collapse of the client protein then drives its folding. By burying hydrophobic residues in its core, the client's affinity to Spy decreases, which causes client release. By allowing the client to fold itself, Spy circumvents the need for client-specific folding instructions. This mechanism might help explain how chaperones can facilitate the folding of various unrelated proteins.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingCarrier ProteinsEntropyEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular ChaperonesPeriplasmPeriplasmic ProteinsStatic ElectricityCarrier ProteinsE colicin-binding immunity protein Im7, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesPeriplasmic ProteinsSpy protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID27293188
PMCPMC4947014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.