Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27292944›Full record

ArticleFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2016

Modeling the emetic potencies of food-borne trichothecenes by benchmark dose methodology.

Denis Male, Wenda Wu, Nicole J Mitchell, Steven Bursian, James J Pestka, Felicia Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denis MaleDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Wenda WuDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Nicole J MitchellDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Steven BursianDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
James J PestkaDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Felicia WuDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. Electronic address: fwu@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007255 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN J LAPRES · 1989 to 2026
$9.3M
The Effect of Aflatoxin Regulation on Global Liver Cancer RisksR01CA153073 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, FELICIA · 2010 to 2013
$916k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA153073NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trichothecene mycotoxins commonly co-contaminate cereal products. They cause immunosuppression, anorexia, and emesis in multiple species. Dietary exposure to such toxins often occurs in mixtures. Hence, if it were possible to determine their relative toxicities and assign toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) to each trichothecene, risk management and regulation of these mycotoxins could become more comprehensive and simple. We used a mink emesis model to compare the toxicities of deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, nivalenol, fusarenon-X, HT-2 toxin, and T-2 toxin. These toxins were administered to mink via gavage and intraperitoneal injection. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benchmark dose software was used to determine benchmark doses for each trichothecene. The relative potencies of each of these toxins were calculated as the ratios of their benchmark doses to that of DON. Our results showed that mink were more sensitive to orally administered toxins than to toxins administered by IP. T-2 and HT-2 toxins caused the greatest emetic responses, followed by FX, and then by DON, its acetylated derivatives, and NIV. Although these results provide key information on comparative toxicities, there is still a need for more animal based studies focusing on various endpoints and combined effects of trichothecenes before TEFs can be established.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationModels, TheoreticalAdministration, OralAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmeticsInjections, IntraperitonealMinkTrichothecenesVomitingEmeticsTrichothecenesDeoxynivalenolEmesisMycotoxinsToxic equivalency factor

Identifiers

PMID27292944
PMCPMC4930881
OpenAlexW2416581388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.