Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2016
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 669 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An open-label, randomized phase 3 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin compared to a defined investigator's choice in adult patients with relapsed or refractory cd22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (all)
The Regimen of Blinatumomab and Venetoclax Sequenced With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Precursor B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Phase II, Single Arm and Multicenter Study
Who cites it
669 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,340 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for management of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- [Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2024)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024Guideline
- Inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy for measurable residual disease in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Obecabtagene Autoleucel in Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Trial
- Association of leukemic molecular profile with efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed/refractory ALL.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- A phase 1/2 study of mini-hyper-CVD plus venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- A phase 2 and pharmacological study of sapanisertib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Trial watch: antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy.Oncoimmunology · 2026Review
- Allogeneic HSCT outcomes and impact of defibrotide prophylaxis on SOS after inotuzumab in pediatric B-ALL.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Clinical Implications of CD19-Negative Relapse Following CD19-Directed Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Outcomes by Body Mass Index in Patients With B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- High-risk features in adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: redefining risk in the era of targeted immunotherapy.Blood research · 2026Review
- Hematopoietic cell transplantation after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for remission consolidation or relapse treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Incorporating Immunotherapies into the Evolving Standard of Care for Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
609 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis for adults with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poor. We sought to determine whether inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, results in better outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia than does standard therapy.
methodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab ozogamicin group) or standard intensive chemotherapy (standard-therapy group). The primary end points were complete remission (including complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and overall survival.
resultsOf the 326 patients who underwent randomization, the first 218 (109 in each group) were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of complete remission. The rate of complete remission was significantly higher in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group than in the standard-therapy group (80.7% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 72.1 to 87.7] vs. 29.4% [95% CI, 21.0 to 38.8], P<0.001). Among the patients who had complete remission, a higher percentage in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease (0.01% marrow blasts) (78.4% vs. 28.1%, P<0.001); the duration of remission was longer in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group (median, 4.6 months [95% CI, 3.9 to 5.4] vs. 3.1 months [95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9]; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.96]; P=0.03). In the survival analysis, which included all 326 patients, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group (median, 5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6] vs. 1.8 months [95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2]; hazard ratio, 0.45 [97.5% CI, 0.34 to 0.61]; P<0.001); the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 9.2) versus 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 8.3), and the hazard ratio was 0.77 (97.5% CI, 0.58 to 1.03) (P=0.04). In the safety population, the most frequent grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events with inotuzumab ozogamicin were liver-related. Veno-occlusive liver disease of any grade occurred in 15 patients (11%) who received inotuzumab ozogamicin and in 1 patient (1%) who received standard therapy.
conclusionsThe rate of complete remission was higher with inotuzumab ozogamicin than with standard therapy, and a higher percentage of patients in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease. Both progression-free and overall survival were longer with inotuzumab ozogamicin. Veno-occlusive liver disease was a major adverse event associated with inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Funded by Pfizer; INO-VATE ALL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01564784.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.