Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27291962›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2016

C-type lectin receptors in the control of T helper cell differentiation.

Teunis B H Geijtenbeek, Sonja I Gringhuis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Ameliorative effects ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  4. Synthetic Ligands of Myeloid C-Type Lectin Receptors.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. T cell-intrinsic PRR signaling in immunity and pathology.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teunis B H GeijtenbeekDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sonja I GringhuisDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogen recognition by C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) expressed by dendritic cells is important not only for antigen presentation, but also for the induction of appropriate adaptive immune responses via T helper (TH) cell differentiation. CLRs act either by themselves or in cooperation with other receptors, such as other CLRs, Toll-like receptors and interferon receptors, to induce signalling pathways that trigger specialized cytokine programmes for polarization of TH cell differentiation. In this Review, we discuss how triggering of the prototypical CLRs leads to distinct pathogen-tailored TH cell responses and how we can harness our expanding knowledge for vaccine design and the treatment of inflammatory and malignant diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansLectins, C-TypeLymphocyte ActivationSignal TransductionT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerLectins, C-Type

Identifiers

PMID27291962
OpenAlexW2423259930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.