Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27291619›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

CRISPR/Cas9-induced knockout and knock-in mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Sung-Eun Shin, Jong-Min Lim, Hyun Gi Koh, Eun Kyung Kim, Nam Kyu Kang, Seungjib Jeon, Sohee Kwon, Won-Sub Shin, Bongsoo Lee, Kwon Hwangbo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 413 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Quantitative Evaluation of NR Locus-Targeted Nuclear Transformation inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Metabolic Engineering of Microalgae for Biofuel Production.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  11. CRISPR-Cas Technology TurnsMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sung-Eun ShinDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Min LimKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Gi KohDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Eun Kyung KimAdvanced Biomass R&D Center (ABC), KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Nam Kyu KangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Seungjib JeonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Sohee KwonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Won-Sub ShinDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Bongsoo LeeDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Kwon HwangboKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Jungeun KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hyeok YeCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Young YunCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Hogyun SeoSchool of Life Sciences, KNU Creative BioResearch Group, Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Mock OhKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Jin KimSchool of Life Sciences, KNU Creative BioResearch Group, Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Soo KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Won-Joong JeongKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Yong Keun ChangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Byeong-Ryool JeongDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRInstitute for Basic Science · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRAdvanced Biomass R&D Center (South Korea) · KRKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing is crucial for genetic engineering of organisms for improved traits, particularly in microalgae due to the urgent necessity for the next generation biofuel production. The most advanced CRISPR/Cas9 system is simple, efficient and accurate in some organisms; however, it has proven extremely difficult in microalgae including the model alga Chlamydomonas. We solved this problem by delivering Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) comprising the Cas9 protein and sgRNAs to avoid cytotoxicity and off-targeting associated with vector-driven expression of Cas9. We obtained CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations at three loci including MAA7, CpSRP43 and ChlM, and targeted mutagenic efficiency was improved up to 100 fold compared to the first report of transgenic Cas9-induced mutagenesis. Interestingly, we found that unrelated vectors used for the selection purpose were predominantly integrated at the Cas9 cut site, indicative of NHEJ-mediated knock-in events. As expected with Cas9 RNPs, no off-targeting was found in one of the mutagenic screens. In conclusion, we improved the knockout efficiency by using Cas9 RNPs, which opens great opportunities not only for biological research but also industrial applications in Chlamydomonas and other microalgae. Findings of the NHEJ-mediated knock-in events will allow applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in microalgae, including "safe harboring" techniques shown in other organisms.

Indexed as

Algal ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceChlamydomonas reinhardtiiChlorophyllCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA End-Joining RepairGene TargetingGenetic LociMutagenesisPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, DNATryptophan SynthaseWhole Genome SequencingAlgal ProteinsChlorophyllRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTryptophan Synthase

Identifiers

PMID27291619
PMCPMC4904240
OpenAlexW2443008206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.