Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27290695›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2016

Non-surgical organ preservation strategies for locally advanced laryngeal tumors: what is the Italian attitude? Results of a national survey on behalf of AIRO and AIOM.

D Alterio, P Franco, G Numico, L Licitra, M Cossu Rocca, A Ferrari, C Pinto, E G Russi, U Ricardi, B A Jereczek Fossa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in radiation oncology.Ecancermedicalscience · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

D AlterioDepartment of Radiotherapy, Advanced Radiotherapy Center, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. daniela.alterio@ieo.it.
P FrancoDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
G NumicoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale U. Parini, Aosta, Italy.
L LicitraHead and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M Cossu RoccaGenitourinary Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
A FerrariDepartment of Radiotherapy, Advanced Radiotherapy Center, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
C PintoMedical Oncology, IRCCS-Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
E G RussiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Santa Croce General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
U RicardiDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
B A Jereczek FossaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Advanced Radiotherapy Center, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Ripamonti · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 % radiation and 36 % medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 %). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 %) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 % proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 % of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansItalyLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurveys and QuestionnairesChemoradiotherapyLaryngeal tumorOrgan preservationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID27290695
OpenAlexW2418117885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.