Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27290643›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2016

Selection pressure on human STR loci and its relevance in repeat expansion disease.

Makoto K Shimada, Ryoko Sanbonmatsu, Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata, Chisato Yamasaki, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Ranajit Chakraborty, Takashi Gojobori, Tadashi Imanishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tandem repeat disorders.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Makoto K ShimadaInstitute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. mshimada@fujita-hu.ac.jp.
Ryoko SanbonmatsuJapan Biological Informatics Consortium, 10F TIME24 Building, 2-4-32 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8073, Japan.
Yumi Yamaguchi-KabataNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 2-3-26 Aomi Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan.
Chisato YamasakiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 2-3-26 Aomi Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan.
Yoshiyuki SuzukiGraduate School of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1 Yamanohata, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8501, Japan.
Ranajit ChakrabortyHealth Science Center, University of North Texas, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.
Takashi GojoboriNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 2-3-26 Aomi Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan.
Tadashi ImanishiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 2-3-26 Aomi Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPJapan Biological Informatics Consortium · JPNagoya City University · JPUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) comprise repeats of one to several base pairs. Because of the high mutability due to strand slippage during DNA synthesis, rapid evolutionary change in the number of repeating units directly shapes the range of repeat-number variation according to selection pressure. However, the remaining questions include: Why are STRs causing repeat expansion diseases maintained in the human population; and why are these limited to neurodegenerative diseases? By evaluating the genome-wide selection pressure on STRs using the database we constructed, we identified two different patterns of relationship in repeat-number polymorphisms between DNA and amino-acid sequences, although both patterns are evolutionary consequences of avoiding the formation of harmful long STRs. First, a mixture of degenerate codons is represented in poly-proline (poly-P) repeats. Second, long poly-glutamine (poly-Q) repeats are favored at the protein level; however, at the DNA level, STRs encoding long poly-Qs are frequently divided by synonymous SNPs. Furthermore, significant enrichments of apoptosis and neurodevelopment were biological processes found specifically in genes encoding poly-Qs with repeat polymorphism. This suggests the existence of a specific molecular function for polymorphic and/or long poly-Q stretches. Given that the poly-Qs causing expansion diseases were longer than other poly-Qs, even in healthy subjects, our results indicate that the evolutionary benefits of long and/or polymorphic poly-Q stretches outweigh the risks of long CAG repeats predisposing to pathological hyper-expansions. Molecular pathways in neurodevelopment requiring long and polymorphic poly-Q stretches may provide a clue to understanding why poly-Q expansion diseases are limited to neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsNeurogenesisDiseaseEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinDatabase for human polymorphism (VarySysDB)Human evolutionSingle amino-acid repeatSTR polymorphismTriplet-repeat expansion disease

Identifiers

PMID27290643
OpenAlexW2416120812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.