Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27289186›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2016

Prophylactic Use of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Ali Zandieh, Steven R Messé, Brett Cucchiara, Michael T Mullen, Scott E Kasner, VISTA-ICH Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Patterns of prophylactic anticonvulsant use in spontaneous intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a practitioner survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Childhood stroke.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali ZandiehDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Steven R MesséDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brett CucchiaraDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael T MullenDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Scott E KasnerDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kasner@mail.med.upenn.edu.
VISTA-ICH Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Philadelphia Regional Stroke Trials Network Coordinating Center (PRSTNCC)U24NS107224 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brett Lee Cucchiara · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
The Philadelphia Regional Stroke Trials Network coordinating Center (PRSTNCC)U10NS086474 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KASNER, SCOTT E · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086474NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on mortality and functional outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is uncertain.

methodsWe used data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) to evaluate the effect of prophylactic AEDs on ICH outcome. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression models were designed to determine the impact of prophylactic AEDs on mortality and disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) greater than 3 at 90 days following ICH.

resultsOf the 802 patients with ICH, 81 (10%) received prophylactic AEDs. Patients who received AED prophylaxis had higher ICH volume (median 23.2 cm(3) [IQR 10.5-38.0] versus 14.3 cm(3) [IQR 7.1-27.0], P= .001) and ICH score (median 1 cm(3) [IQR 0-2] versus 1 cm(3) [IQR 0-1], P = .03). In univariate analyses, AED prophylaxis was associated with higher probability of mRS greater than 3 at 90 days (62% versus 49%, P = .03) and a trend towards increased mortality (27% versus 18%, P = .06). Although seizure did not influence ICH outcome, any AED prophylaxis and phenytoin use in particular were both associated with mRS greater than 3 at 90 days (OR 1.66 [1.04-2.66], P = .03 for any AED; OR 1.97 [1.06-3.67], P = .03 for phenytoin prophylaxis) in univariate analyses. After adjustment for components of the ICH score, none of these associations remained significant.

conclusionPatients with higher ICH scores and larger hemorrhages are more likely to receive prophylactic AEDs. We found no independent effect of prophylactic AED treatment on outcome after ICH.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceAnticonvulsantsCerebral HemorrhageClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedSeizuresTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsantiepileptic drugsIntracerebral hemorrhagemortalityoutcome

Identifiers

PMID27289186
PMCPMC5012954
OpenAlexW2417507895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.