Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27289015›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2017

Combined hybridization capture and shotgun sequencing for ancient DNA analysis of extinct wild and domestic dromedary camel.

Elmira Mohandesan, Camilla F Speller, Joris Peters, Hans-Peter Uerpmann, Margarethe Uerpmann, Bea De Cupere, Michael Hofreiter, Pamela A Burger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. De-Extinction.Genes · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Elmira MohandesanResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstraße 1, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
Camilla F SpellerBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Joris PetersDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 80539, Munich, Germany.
Hans-Peter UerpmannAbteilung Archäozoologie, Institut für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, 7207, Tübingen, Germany.
Margarethe UerpmannStaatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns, Bavarian State Collection of Anthropology and Palaeoanatomy, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Bea De CupereRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Michael HofreiterBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Pamela A BurgerResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Savoyenstraße 1, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
Bavarian Natural History Collections · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of York · GBInstitute of Natural Sciences · BEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of hybridization capture combined with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has seen limited investigation with samples from hot and arid regions until now. We applied hybridization capture and shotgun sequencing to recover DNA sequences from bone specimens of ancient-domestic dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) and its extinct ancestor, the wild dromedary from Jordan, Syria, Turkey and the Arabian Peninsula, respectively. Our results show that hybridization capture increased the percentage of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) recovery by an average 187-fold and in some cases yielded virtually complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes at multifold coverage in a single capture experiment. Furthermore, we tested the effect of hybridization temperature and time by using a touchdown approach on a limited number of samples. We observed no significant difference in the number of unique dromedary mtDNA reads retrieved with the standard capture compared to the touchdown method. In total, we obtained 14 partial mitochondrial genomes from ancient-domestic dromedaries with 17-95% length coverage and 1.27-47.1-fold read depths for the covered regions. Using whole-genome shotgun sequencing, we successfully recovered endogenous dromedary nuclear DNA (nuDNA) from domestic and wild dromedary specimens with 1-1.06-fold read depths for covered regions. Our results highlight that despite recent methodological advances, obtaining ancient DNA (aDNA) from specimens recovered from hot, arid environments is still problematic. Hybridization protocols require specific optimization, and samples at the limit of DNA preservation need multiple replications of DNA extraction and hybridization capture as has been shown previously for Middle Pleistocene specimens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildArab WorldCamelusDesert ClimateDNA, AncientDNA, MitochondrialNucleic Acid HybridizationSequence Analysis, DNATemperatureTime FactorsTurkeyDNA, AncientDNA, Mitochondrialancient DNACamelus dromedariuscapture enrichmentdegraded DNAmitochondrial genome (mtDNA)next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27289015
PMCPMC5324683
OpenAlexW2416772112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.