Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27288744›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2016

The thermostability and specificity of ancient proteins.

Lucas C Wheeler, Shion A Lim, Susan Marqusee, Michael J Harms

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chemoenzymatic synthesis.Communications chemistry · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas C WheelerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States; Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Shion A LimDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States; Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Susan MarquseeDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States; Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States. Electronic address: marqusee@berkeley.edu.
Michael J HarmsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States; Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States. Electronic address: harms@uoregon.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
Univ of Calif Berkeley Chemistry-Biology Interface ProgramT32GM066698 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CHANG, CHRISTOPHER J., FRANCIS, MATTHEW B · 2004 to 2023
$7.5M
Sequence and Environmental Determinants of the Protein Energy LandscapeR01GM050945 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MARQUSEE, SUSAN · 1999 to 2022
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050945NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Were ancient proteins systematically different than modern proteins? The answer to this question is profoundly important, shaping how we understand the origins of protein biochemical, biophysical, and functional properties. Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR), a phylogenetic approach to infer the sequences of ancestral proteins, may reveal such trends. We discuss two proposed trends: a transition from higher to lower thermostability and a tendency for proteins to acquire higher specificity over time. We review the evidence for elevated ancestral thermostability and discuss its possible origins in a changing environmental temperature and/or reconstruction bias. We also conclude that there is, as yet, insufficient data to support a trend from promiscuity to specificity. Finally, we propose future work to understand these proposed evolutionary trends.

Indexed as

TemperatureAnimalsEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyProteinsProtein StabilitySubstrate SpecificityProteins

Identifiers

PMID27288744
PMCPMC5010474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.