ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Inferring the perturbation time from biological time course data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic selection during laboratory evolution of yeast populations leads to a genome-wide sustainable chromatin compaction shift.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Analysis of chromatin organization and gene expression in T cells identifies functional genes for rheumatoid arthritis.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A personalised approach for identifying disease-relevant pathways in heterogeneous diseases.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020Article
- TimeMeter assesses temporal gene expression similarity and identifies differentially progressing genes.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis of differential gene expression tools for RNA sequencing time course data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- GPrank: an R package for detecting dynamic elements from genome-wide time series.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Branch-recombinant Gaussian processes for analysis of perturbations in biological time series.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- BGP: identifying gene-specific branching dynamics from single-cell data with a branching Gaussian process.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Single-cell RNA-seq and computational analysis using temporal mixture modelling resolves Th1/Tfh fate bifurcation in malaria.Science immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationTime course data are often used to study the changes to a biological process after perturbation. Statistical methods have been developed to determine whether such a perturbation induces changes over time, e.g. comparing a perturbed and unperturbed time course dataset to uncover differences. However, existing methods do not provide a principled statistical approach to identify the specific time when the two time course datasets first begin to diverge after a perturbation; we call this the perturbation time. Estimation of the perturbation time for different variables in a biological process allows us to identify the sequence of events following a perturbation and therefore provides valuable insights into likely causal relationships.
resultsWe propose a Bayesian method to infer the perturbation time given time course data from a wild-type and perturbed system. We use a non-parametric approach based on Gaussian Process regression. We derive a probabilistic model of noise-corrupted and replicated time course data coming from the same profile before the perturbation time and diverging after the perturbation time. The likelihood function can be worked out exactly for this model and the posterior distribution of the perturbation time is obtained by a simple histogram approach, without recourse to complex approximate inference algorithms. We validate the method on simulated data and apply it to study the transcriptional change occurring in Arabidopsis following inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 versus the disarmed strain DC3000hrpA AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: : An R package, DEtime, implementing the method is available at https://github.com/ManchesterBioinference/DEtime along with the data and code required to reproduce all the results. CONTACT: Jing.Yang@manchester.ac.uk or Magnus.Rattray@manchester.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.