Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27288414›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2016

Gay mobile apps and the evolving virtual risk environment: a cross-sectional online survey among men who have sex with men in China.

Weiming Tang, John Best, Ye Zhang, Feng-Ying Liu, Lai Sze Tso, Shujie Huang, Bin Yang, Chongyi Wei, Joseph D Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
John BestUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Ye ZhangUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Feng-Ying LiuGuangdong Provincial Centres for Skin Diseases and STI Control, Guangzhou, China.
Lai Sze TsoUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Shujie HuangGuangdong Provincial Centres for Skin Diseases and STI Control, Guangzhou, China.
Bin YangGuangdong Provincial Centres for Skin Diseases and STI Control, Guangzhou, China.
Chongyi WeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco California, USA.
Joseph D TuckerUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
Spurring Innovation in HIV Testing and Linkage: A Crowdsourcing Approach -Diversity SupplementR01AI114310 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID, WEI, CHONGYI · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
UNC-South China STD Research Training CenterD43TW009532 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COHEN, MYRON SCOTT, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
A Social Marketing Approach to Increase HIV Testing among High-Risk Men in ChinaR00MH093201 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEI, CHONGYI · 2013 to 2015
$680k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009532FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114310NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH093201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe expansion of gay sex-seeking application (gay app) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) may create new virtual risk environments that facilitate STI transmission. The goals of this study were to compare sexual behaviours between gay app users and non-users, and to describe sexual behaviours among gay app users in China.

methodsIn October 2014, we recruited MSM from three Chinese gay websites. Data on sociodemographics, sexual behaviours and gay app use were collected. Logistic regressions were used to compare gay app users with non-app users and to identify factors associated with condomless sex among gay app users.

resultsOf the 1424 participants, most were <30 years old (77.5%), single (83.8%) and self-identified as gay (72.9%). Overall, 824 (57.9%) had used gay apps for partner-seeking in the last 6 months. Among gay app users, 36.4% met their last partner within 24 hours of first message exchange through gay apps, and 59.0% negotiated condom use before in-person meeting. Compared with non-users, gay app users reported engaging in more condomless sex in the last 6 months (adjusted OR (aOR) =1.52, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.94) and more group sex (aOR =1.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.18). Negotiating condom use before in-person meeting was positively associated with condom use with partners met through gay apps (aOR =1.83, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.60).

conclusionsGay apps are linked to risky sexual behaviours and may foster a virtual risk environment for STI transmission among Chinese MSM. App-based interventions could target young gay man and facilitate condom negotiation.

Indexed as

CHINAGAY MENHIVSEXUAL BEHAVIOUR

Identifiers

PMID27288414
PMCPMC5148710
OpenAlexW2417037931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.