ArticleBMJ open2016
Costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a routine data analysis in Bavaria.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Pooled it
- Procurement in German office based ambulatory physician practices: system specific challenges and evidence based management strategies.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Accountability, autonomy, equity, and trust in selected healthcare systems: a comparative analysis.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- Spatial and temporal disparities in general practitioner provision: a 21-year longitudinal analysis from Lower Saxony, Germany.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
- Compounding risks of chronic health conditions and substance use disorder on healthcare burden in the USA: Analysis of NSDUH data (2021-2023).Addictive behaviors reports · 2025Article
- Access points to different levels of health care over 13 years. Utilization behaviour in a changing health care system. Results of a three-wave cross-sectional series in Austria.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Regional variations in multimorbidity burden among office-based physicians in Germany.European journal of public health · 2023Article
- Observational
- The impact of ambulatory care spending, continuity and processes of care on ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Beyond patient-sharing: Comparing physician- and patient-induced networks.Health care management science · 2022Article
- Development of indicators to assess quality and patient pathways in interdisciplinary care for patients with 14 ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions in Germany.BMC health services research · 2022Review
- Article
- "I Have Such a Great Care" - Geriatric Patients' Experiences with a New Healthcare Model: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Article
- Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study.BMC family practice · 2020Observational
- Strong primary care and patients' survival.Scientific reports · 2019Observational
- Variation in coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients according to health literacy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- Changes in care coordination and health insurance in the population of US children with muscular dystrophy, 2005-2006 and 2009-2010.International journal of care coordination · 2018Article
- Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2018Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe efficiency of a gatekeeping system for a health system, as in Germany, remains unclear particularly as access to specialist ambulatory care is not restricted. The aim was to compare the costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated patients (UP) in ambulatory care; with additional subgroup analysis of patients with mental disorders.
designRetrospective routine data analysis of patients with statutory health insurance, using claims data held by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. A patient was defined as uncoordinated if he or she visited at least 1 specialist without a referral from a general practitioner within a quarter. Outcomes were compared with propensity score matching analysis.
participantsThe study encompassed all statutorily insured patients in Bavaria contacting at least 1 ambulatory specialist in the first quarter of 2011 (n=3 616 510). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was total costs of ambulatory care; secondary outcomes were financial claims of general physicians, specialists and for medication.
resultsThe average age was 55.3 years for coordinated patients (CP, n=1 629 302), 48.3 years for UP (n=1 825 840). CP more frequently had chronic diseases (85.4%) as compared with UP (67.5%). The total unadjusted financial claim per patient was higher for UP (€234.52) than for CP (€224.41); the total adjusted difference was -€9.65 (95% CI -11.64 to -7.67), indicating lower costs for CP. The cost differences increased with increasing age. Total adjusted difference per patient with mental diseases as documented with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 F-diagnosis, was -€20.31 (95% CI -26.43 to -14.46).
conclusionsCoordination of care is associated with lower ambulatory healthcare expenditures and is of particular importance for patients who are more vulnerable to medical interventions, especially for elderly and patients with mental disorders. The role of general practitioners as coordinators should be strengthened to improve care for these patients as this could also help to frame a more efficient health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.