Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27288348›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2016

Species-wide survey reveals the various flavors of intraspecific reproductive isolation in yeast.

Jing Hou, Téo Fournier, Joseph Schacherer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. mSphere · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing HouDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Microbiology, University of Strasbourg/CNRS UMR 7156, Strasbourg, France.
Téo FournierDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Microbiology, University of Strasbourg/CNRS UMR 7156, Strasbourg, France.
Joseph SchachererDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Microbiology, University of Strasbourg/CNRS UMR 7156, Strasbourg, France schacherer@unistra.fr.

Funding

Genetic basis of stress tolerance in natural populations of yeastR01GM101091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DUNHAM, MAITREYA J, HESS, DAVID CHARLES · 2012 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring the origin and extent of reproductive isolation within the same species is valuable to capture early events to the onset of speciation. In multiple genetic models, reproductive isolation was recently observed at the intraspecific scale, indicating that the raw potential for speciation segregates readily within populations, which could be a rule rather than an exception in a broad context. We briefly recapitulate the molecular evidence of intrinsic post-zygotic isolation in major model organisms including Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and their close relatives. We then focus on recent advances in yeast and review the genetic basis of post-zygotic isolation within and between multiple members of the Saccharomyces genus, especially in Saccharomyces cerevisiae We discuss the role of various mechanisms involved in the onset of reproductive isolation including DNA sequence divergence, chromosomal rearrangement, cytonuclear as well as nuclear-nuclear genetic incompatibilities and provide a comparative view along a continuum of genetic differentiation, which encompasses intraspecific populations, recent delineating nascent species as well as closely related sister species in the same subphylum.

Indexed as

Reproductive IsolationAnimalsArabidopsisCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularSaccharomycesintraspecificreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID27288348
PMCPMC5976011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.