Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27288093›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2016

Applying Sparse Machine Learning Methods to Twitter: Analysis of the 2012 Change in Pap Smear Guidelines. A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

Courtney Rees Lyles, Andrew Godbehere, Gem Le, Laurent El Ghaoui, Urmimala Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Celebrity Cancer on Twitter: Mapping a Novel Opportunity for Cancer Prevention.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Courtney Rees LylesCenter for Vulnerable Populations & Division of General Internal Medicine at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. courtney.lyles@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-8595
Andrew Godbehere
Gem Le
Laurent El Ghaoui
Urmimala Sarkar

Funding

Influencing cervical cancer prevention and detection online through social mediaR01CA178875 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CENTOLA, DAMON, SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2014 to 2016
$1.3M
Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient PortalR00HS022408 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2015 to 2017
$740k
Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient PortalK99HS022408 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2013 to 2014
$311k
AHRQ HHS K99 HS022408AHRQ HHS R00 HS022408NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is difficult to synthesize the vast amount of textual data available from social media websites. Capturing real-world discussions via social media could provide insights into individuals' opinions and the decision-making process.

objectiveWe conducted a sequential mixed methods study to determine the utility of sparse machine learning techniques in summarizing Twitter dialogues. We chose a narrowly defined topic for this approach: cervical cancer discussions over a 6-month time period surrounding a change in Pap smear screening guidelines.

methodsWe applied statistical methodologies, known as sparse machine learning algorithms, to summarize Twitter messages about cervical cancer before and after the 2012 change in Pap smear screening guidelines by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). All messages containing the search terms "cervical cancer," "Pap smear," and "Pap test" were analyzed during: (1) January 1-March 13, 2012, and (2) March 14-June 30, 2012. Topic modeling was used to discern the most common topics from each time period, and determine the singular value criterion for each topic. The results were then qualitatively coded from top 10 relevant topics to determine the efficiency of clustering method in grouping distinct ideas, and how the discussion differed before vs. after the change in guidelines .

resultsThis machine learning method was effective in grouping the relevant discussion topics about cervical cancer during the respective time periods (~20% overall irrelevant content in both time periods). Qualitative analysis determined that a significant portion of the top discussion topics in the second time period directly reflected the USPSTF guideline change (eg, "New Screening Guidelines for Cervical Cancer"), and many topics in both time periods were addressing basic screening promotion and education (eg, "It is Cervical Cancer Awareness Month! Click the link to see where you can receive a free or low cost Pap test.")

conclusionsIt was demonstrated that machine learning tools can be useful in cervical cancer prevention and screening discussions on Twitter. This method allowed us to prove that there is publicly available significant information about cervical cancer screening on social media sites. Moreover, we observed a direct impact of the guideline change within the Twitter messages.

Indexed as

cervical cancermachine learningqualitative researchsocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID27288093
PMCPMC4920957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.