Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287805›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

Pins is not required for spindle orientation in the Drosophila wing disc.

Dan T Bergstralh, Holly E Lovegrove, Izabela Kujawiak, Nicole S Dawney, Jinwei Zhu, Samantha Cooper, Rongguang Zhang, Daniel St Johnston

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The wing imaginal disc.Genetics · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dan T BergstralhThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-3715
Holly E LovegroveThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Izabela KujawiakThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Nicole S DawneyThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Jinwei ZhuNational Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Samantha CooperThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Rongguang ZhangNational Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Daniel St JohnstonThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK d.stjohnston@gurdon.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-3301
University of Cambridge · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Cancer Research UK A14492Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 080007Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal cells, mitotic spindles are oriented by the dynein/dynactin motor complex, which exerts a pulling force on astral microtubules. Dynein/dynactin localization depends on Mud/NUMA, which is typically recruited to the cortex by Pins/LGN. In Drosophila neuroblasts, the Inscuteable/Baz/Par-6/aPKC complex recruits Pins apically to induce vertical spindle orientation, whereas in epithelial cells Dlg recruits Pins laterally to orient the spindle horizontally. Here we investigate division orientation in the Drosophila imaginal wing disc epithelium. Live imaging reveals that spindle angles vary widely during prometaphase and metaphase, and therefore do not reliably predict division orientation. This finding prompted us to re-examine mutants that have been reported to disrupt division orientation in this tissue. Loss of Mud misorients divisions, but Inscuteable expression and aPKC, dlg and pins mutants have no effect. Furthermore, Mud localizes to the apical-lateral cortex of the wing epithelium independently of both Pins and cell cycle stage. Thus, Pins is not required in the wing disc because there are parallel mechanisms for Mud localization and hence spindle orientation, making it a more robust system than in other epithelia.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Dissociation InhibitorsImaginal DiscsMutationSignal TransductionSpindle ApparatusWings, AnimalCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitorsinsc protein, DrosophilaPins protein, DrosophilaDrosophilaEpitheliaMud/NuMAPins/LGNSpindle orientation

Identifiers

PMID27287805
PMCPMC4958339
OpenAlexW2412225494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.