Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287768›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2016

Frequency of gamma H2AX foci in healthy volunteers and health workers occupationally exposed to X-irradiation and its relevance in biological dosimetry.

Venkateswarlu Raavi, Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen, Vijayalakshmi Jagannathan, Santosh Joseph, Nabo Kumar Chaudhury, Perumal Venkatachalam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venkateswarlu RaaviDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, 600 116, India.
Safa Abdul Syed BasheerudeenDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, 600 116, India.
Vijayalakshmi JagannathanDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, 600 116, India.
Santosh JosephDepartment of Neuro Interventional Radiology, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, 600 116, India.
Nabo Kumar ChaudhuryChemical Radio Protector and Radiation Dosimetry Research Group, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig Mazumdar Road, Timarpur, Delhi, 110 054, India.
Perumal VenkatachalamDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, 600 116, India. venkip@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-2003
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · INInstitute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma-H2AX (γ-H2AX) assay is a marker to measure double-strand breaks in the deoxyribonucleic acid. Variables such as age, oxidative stress, temperature, genetic factors and inter-individual variation have been reported to influence the baseline γ-H2AX focus levels. Therefore, knowledge on baseline frequency of γ-H2AX foci in a targeted population would facilitate reliable radiation triage and dose estimation. The objective of the present study was to establish the baseline data using blood samples from healthy volunteers (n = 130) differing in age, occupation and lifestyle as well as from occupationally exposed health workers (n = 20). The γ-H2AX focus assay was performed using epifluorescence microscopy. In vitro dose-response curve for γ-H2AX foci was constructed in blood samples (n = 3) exposed to X-rays (30 min post-exposure). The mean γ-H2AX focus frequency obtained in healthy volunteers was 0.042 ± 0.001 and showed an age-related increase (p < 0.001). Significantly higher (p < 0.005) focus frequencies were observed in health workers (0.066 ± 0.005) than in healthy volunteers. A sub-group analysis did not show a significant (p > 0.1) difference in γ-H2AX focus frequency among sexes. Blood exposed in vitro to X-rays showed dose-dependent increase in γ-H2AX foci frequency (Y = 0.1902 ± 0.1363 + 2.9020 ± 0.3240 * D). Baseline frequency of γ-H2AX foci obtained from different age groups showed a significant (p < 0.01) influence on the dose-response coefficients. The overall results demonstrated that the γ-H2AX assay can be used as a reliable biomarker for radiation triage and estimating the radiation absorbed dose by considering variables such as age, occupation and lifestyle factors.

Indexed as

X-RaysAdolescentAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHealth PersonnelHealthy VolunteersHistonesHumansLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureH2AX protein, humanHistonesBiodosimetryOccupational exposureX-irradiationγ-H2AX foci

Identifiers

PMID27287768
OpenAlexW2419324627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.