Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287701›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Value of Image Fusion in Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.

Julien Plessis, Karine Warin Fresse, Zachary Cahouch, Thibaut Manigold, Vincent Letocart, Laurianne Le Gloan, Béatrice Guyomarch, Patrice Guerin

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julien PlessisInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France julien.plessis@chu-nantes.fr.
Karine Warin FresseInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Zachary CahouchInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Thibaut ManigoldInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Vincent LetocartInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Laurianne Le GloanInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Béatrice GuyomarchInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Patrice GuerinInstitut du Thorax, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary angiography is more complex in patients with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). Image fusion is a new technology that allows the overlay of a computed tomography (CT) three-dimension (3D) model with fluoroscopic images in real time. METHODS AND

resultsThis single-center prospective study included 66 previous CABG patients undergoing coronary and bypass graft angiography. Image fusion coronary angiographies (fusion group, 20 patients) were compared to conventional coronary angiographies (control group, 46 patients). The fusion group included patients for whom a previous chest CT scan with contrast was available. For patients in this group, aorta and CABG were reconstructed in 3D from CT acquisitions and merged in real time with fluoroscopic images. The following parameters were compared: time needed to localize the CABG; procedure duration; air kerma (AK); dose area product (DAP); and volume of contrast media injected. Results are expressed as median. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in patient demographics and procedure characteristics (access site, number of bypass to be found, and interventional cardiologist's experience). The time to localize CABG was significantly shorter in the fusion group (7.3 versus 12.4 minutes; P=0.002), as well as the procedure duration (20.6 versus 25.6 minutes; P=0.002), AK (610 versus 814 mGy; P=0.02), DAP (4390 versus 5922.5 cGy·cm(2); P=0.02), and volume of iodinated contrast media (85 versus 116 cc; P=0.002).

conclusions3D image fusion improves the CABG detection in coronary angiography and reduces the time necessary to localize CABG, total procedure time duration, radiation exposure, and volume of contrast media.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureTime Factorscardiovascular imagingcomputed tomographycoronary angiographycoronary artery bypass graftfluoroscopyfusion imagingradiation exposurereal‐time imaging

Identifiers

PMID27287701
PMCPMC4937242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.