Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287511›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Surprisingly rich repertoire of Wnt genes in the demosponge Halisarca dujardini.

Ilya Borisenko, Marcin Adamski, Alexander Ereskovsky, Maja Adamska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The origin and evolution of Wnt signalling.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Studying Porifera WBR Using the Calcerous Sponges Leucosolenia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Structure of the RECK CC domain, an evolutionary anomaly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Embryonic expression of priapulid Wnt genes.Development genes and evolution · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ilya BorisenkoDepartment of Embryology, Faculty of Biology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Marcin AdamskiSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Alexander EreskovskyDepartment of Embryology, Faculty of Biology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Maja AdamskaSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. maja.adamska@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-8450
Australian National University · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWnt proteins are secreted signalling molecules found in all animal phyla. In bilaterian animals, including humans, Wnt proteins play key roles in development, maintenance of homeostasis and regeneration. While Wnt gene repertoires and roles are strongly conserved between cnidarians and bilaterians, Wnt genes from basal metazoans (sponges, ctenophores, placozoans) are difficult or impossible to assign to the bilaterian + cnidarian orthologous groups. Moreover, dramatic differences in Wnt numbers among basal metazoan exist, with only three present in the genome of Amphimedon queenslandica, a demosponge, and 21 in the genome of Sycon ciliatum, a calcisponge. To gain insight into the ancestral Wnt repertoire and function, we have chosen to investigate Wnt genes in Halisarca dujardini, a demosponge with relatively well described development and regeneration, and a very distant phylogenetic relationship to Amphimedon.

resultsHere we describe generation of a eukaryotic contamination-free transcriptome of Halisarca dujardini, and analysis of Wnt genes repertoire and expression in this species. We have identified ten Wnt genes, with only one orthologous to Amphimedon Wnt, and six appearing to be a result of a lineage specific expansion. Expression analysis carried out by in situ hybridization of adults and larvae revealed that two Halisarca Wnts are expressed in nested domains in the posterior half of the larvae, and six along the adult body axis, with two specific to the osculum. Strikingly, expression of one of the Wnt genes was elevated in the region undergoing regeneration.

conclusionsOur results demonstrated that the three Poriferan lineages (Demospongiae, Calcarea and Homoloscleromorpha) are characterized by highly diverse Wnt gene repertoires which do not display higher similarity to each other than they do to the non-sponge (i.e. ctenophore, cnidarian and bilaterian) repertoires. This is in striking contrast to the uniform Wnt repertoires in Cnidarians and Bilaterians, suggesting that the Wnt family composition became "fixed" only in the last common ancestor of Cnidarians and Bilaterians. In contrast, expression of Wnt genes in the apical region of sponge adults and the posterior region of sponge larvae suggests conservation of the Wnt role in axial patterning across the animal kingdom.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenomeIn Situ HybridizationPhylogenyPoriferaTranscriptomeWnt ProteinsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27287511
PMCPMC4902976
OpenAlexW2409589559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.