Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27287440›Full record

SynthesisBMC evolutionary biology2016

Home-field advantage? evidence of local adaptation among plants, soil, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through meta-analysis.

Megan A Rúa, Anita Antoninka, Pedro M Antunes, V Bala Chaudhary, Catherine Gehring, Louis J Lamit, Bridget J Piculell, James D Bever, Cathy Zabinski, James F Meadow and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
44.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan A RúaDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, University, 38677, MS, USA. megan.rua@nimbios.org.
Anita AntoninkaSchool of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, 200 E. Pine Knoll, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Pedro M AntunesDepartment of Biology, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2G4, Canada.
V Bala ChaudharyDepartment of Environmental Science and Studies, DePaul University, McGowan South Suite 203, 1110 West Belden Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60614, USA.
Catherine GehringDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA.
Louis J LamitSchool of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI, 49931-1295, USA.
Bridget J PiculellDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, University, 38677, MS, USA.
James D BeverDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
Cathy ZabinskiDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 344 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.
James F MeadowInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, 335 Pacific Hall, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Marc J LajeunesseDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Brook G MilliganDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA.
Justine KarstDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.
Jason D HoeksemaDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, University, 38677, MS, USA.
University of Mississippi · USNorthern Arizona University · USAlgoma University · CADePaul University · USMichigan Technological University · USMontana State University · USNew Mexico State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Oregon · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal adaptation, the differential success of genotypes in their native versus foreign environment, arises from various evolutionary processes, but the importance of concurrent abiotic and biotic factors as drivers of local adaptation has only recently been investigated. Local adaptation to biotic interactions may be particularly important for plants, as they associate with microbial symbionts that can significantly affect their fitness and may enable rapid evolution. The arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is ideal for investigations of local adaptation because it is globally widespread among most plant taxa and can significantly affect plant growth and fitness. Using meta-analysis on 1170 studies (from 139 papers), we investigated the potential for local adaptation to shape plant growth responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation.

resultsThe magnitude and direction for mean effect size of mycorrhizal inoculation on host biomass depended on the geographic origin of the soil and symbiotic partners. Sympatric combinations of plants, AM fungi, and soil yielded large increases in host biomass compared to when all three components were allopatric. The origin of either the fungi or the plant relative to the soil was important for explaining the effect of AM inoculation on plant biomass. If plant and soil were sympatric but allopatric to the fungus, the positive effect of AM inoculation was much greater than when all three components were allopatric, suggesting potential local adaptation of the plant to the soil; however, if fungus and soil were sympatric (but allopatric to the plant) the effect of AM inoculation was indistinct from that of any allopatric combinations, indicating maladaptation of the fungus to the soil.

conclusionsThis study underscores the potential to detect local adaptation for mycorrhizal relationships across a broad swath of the literature. Geographic origin of plants relative to the origin of AM fungal communities and soil is important for describing the effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on plant biomass, suggesting that local adaptation represents a powerful factor for the establishment of novel combinations of fungi, plants, and soils. These results highlight the need for subsequent investigations of local adaptation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis and emphasize the importance of routinely considering the origin of plant, soil, and fungal components.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalPlant Physiological PhenomenaSymbiosisAcclimatizationBiomassEcosystemMycorrhizaePlant RootsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiCommunity ecologyEvolutionGeographic originLocal adaptationSoil micro-organismsSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID27287440
PMCPMC4902977
OpenAlexW2410286963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.